TY - JOUR
T1 - Eosinophils count and periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions
AU - Verdoia, Monica
AU - Schaffer, Alon
AU - Barbieri, Lucia
AU - Sinigaglia, Fabiola
AU - Marino, Paolo
AU - Suryapranata, Harry
AU - De Luca, Giuseppe
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Eosinophils have been involved in a wide spectrum of pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic conditions, with the development of cardiovascular complications in a significant proportion of hypereosinophilic patients. However, no study has so far evaluated the impact of eosinophils levels on periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), that was, then, aim of current study. Methods: In a consecutive cohort of patients, myonecrosis biomarkers were dosed at intervals from 6 to 48h after PCI. Periprocedural myonecrosis was defined as troponin I increase by 3 times the ULN or by 50% of an elevated baseline value, whereas PMI as CKMB increase by 3 times the ULN or 50% of baseline. Results: Our population is represented by 1543 patients who were divided according to tertiles of absolute eosinophils count (AEC≤0.1; 0.1-0.2; >0.2×10̂3/ml). Higher AEC was related to male gender (p=0.002), arterial hypertension (p=0.02), diabetes (p=0.001), previous coronary revascularization (p=0.003 for PCI, p=0.03 for CABG), treatment with ARBs, beta-blockers, diuretics and ASA (p<0.001), statins (p=0.02), calcium antagonists (p=0.05), glycosylated hemoglobin (p<0001), creatinine levels (p=0.001) and platelet count (p=0.01), while inversely with acute presentation (p<0.001), glycemia (p=0.03), HDL-cholesterol and C-reactive protein (p=0.02). AEC related with multivessel coronary artery disease (p=0.05), lesion length (p=0.01), drug eluting stents implantation (p=0.001) and use of kissing balloon technique (p=0.05), while inversely to intracoronary thrombus (p<0.001) and thrombectomy (p=0.04).AEC did not influence the occurrence of PMI (p=0.06, adjusted OR [95% CI]=1.06 [0.86-1.31], p=0.57) or myonecrosis (p=0.15, adjusted OR [95% CI]=1.06 [0.88-1.27], p=0.53). Results were confirmed at subgroup analysis in higher-risk subsets of patients. Conclusion: In patients undergoing non-urgent PCI, eosinophils levels are not associated with the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction or myonecrosis.
AB - Eosinophils have been involved in a wide spectrum of pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic conditions, with the development of cardiovascular complications in a significant proportion of hypereosinophilic patients. However, no study has so far evaluated the impact of eosinophils levels on periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), that was, then, aim of current study. Methods: In a consecutive cohort of patients, myonecrosis biomarkers were dosed at intervals from 6 to 48h after PCI. Periprocedural myonecrosis was defined as troponin I increase by 3 times the ULN or by 50% of an elevated baseline value, whereas PMI as CKMB increase by 3 times the ULN or 50% of baseline. Results: Our population is represented by 1543 patients who were divided according to tertiles of absolute eosinophils count (AEC≤0.1; 0.1-0.2; >0.2×10̂3/ml). Higher AEC was related to male gender (p=0.002), arterial hypertension (p=0.02), diabetes (p=0.001), previous coronary revascularization (p=0.003 for PCI, p=0.03 for CABG), treatment with ARBs, beta-blockers, diuretics and ASA (p<0.001), statins (p=0.02), calcium antagonists (p=0.05), glycosylated hemoglobin (p<0001), creatinine levels (p=0.001) and platelet count (p=0.01), while inversely with acute presentation (p<0.001), glycemia (p=0.03), HDL-cholesterol and C-reactive protein (p=0.02). AEC related with multivessel coronary artery disease (p=0.05), lesion length (p=0.01), drug eluting stents implantation (p=0.001) and use of kissing balloon technique (p=0.05), while inversely to intracoronary thrombus (p<0.001) and thrombectomy (p=0.04).AEC did not influence the occurrence of PMI (p=0.06, adjusted OR [95% CI]=1.06 [0.86-1.31], p=0.57) or myonecrosis (p=0.15, adjusted OR [95% CI]=1.06 [0.88-1.27], p=0.53). Results were confirmed at subgroup analysis in higher-risk subsets of patients. Conclusion: In patients undergoing non-urgent PCI, eosinophils levels are not associated with the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction or myonecrosis.
KW - Eosinophils count
KW - PCI
KW - Periprocedural myocardial infarction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905845486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.06.023
DO - 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.06.023
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9150
VL - 236
SP - 169
EP - 174
JO - Atherosclerosis
JF - Atherosclerosis
IS - 1
ER -