TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysm
T2 - A single-center experience
AU - Fossaceca, Rita
AU - Guzzardi, Giuseppe
AU - Cerini, Paolo
AU - Parziale, Giuseppe
AU - Stanca, Carmelo
AU - Micalizzi, Ezio
AU - Carriero, Alessandro
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background: We assess the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with thoracic artery aneurysm with a retrospective analysis of our experience and a review of the literature. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2011, 53 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent TEVAR. We evaluated the technical success, periprocedural and long-term mortality and morbidity, and follow-up by enhanced computed tomographic scans at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Results: TEVAR was performed in good general conditions in 62.3% of cases and in emergency conditions in 37.7% of cases. A total of 85 endoprostheses were correctly placed, with technical success of 100%. In 18.8% of cases, a carotidesubclavian bypass was performed; 35.8% of cases required drainage of cerebrospinal fluid. Postoperative mortality was 7.5%, and in all cases patients were treated in emergency regimen. The incidence of major postoperative complications was 9.4%, with 2 cases of paraplegia. At a mean follow-up of 25.6 months, 12 cases (22.6%) of endoleak were observed: 5 cases of type IB endoleak were treated with prosthetic extensions; 7 cases of type II endoleak were not treated. There were no thrombotic occlusions, stent migrations, or fractures. Conclusion: TEVAR represents an effective option in the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms, with good immediate and long-term results.
AB - Background: We assess the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with thoracic artery aneurysm with a retrospective analysis of our experience and a review of the literature. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2011, 53 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent TEVAR. We evaluated the technical success, periprocedural and long-term mortality and morbidity, and follow-up by enhanced computed tomographic scans at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Results: TEVAR was performed in good general conditions in 62.3% of cases and in emergency conditions in 37.7% of cases. A total of 85 endoprostheses were correctly placed, with technical success of 100%. In 18.8% of cases, a carotidesubclavian bypass was performed; 35.8% of cases required drainage of cerebrospinal fluid. Postoperative mortality was 7.5%, and in all cases patients were treated in emergency regimen. The incidence of major postoperative complications was 9.4%, with 2 cases of paraplegia. At a mean follow-up of 25.6 months, 12 cases (22.6%) of endoleak were observed: 5 cases of type IB endoleak were treated with prosthetic extensions; 7 cases of type II endoleak were not treated. There were no thrombotic occlusions, stent migrations, or fractures. Conclusion: TEVAR represents an effective option in the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms, with good immediate and long-term results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886096274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.07.032
DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.07.032
M3 - Article
SN - 0890-5096
VL - 27
SP - 1020
EP - 1028
JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery
JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery
IS - 8
ER -