TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrical storm treatment by percutaneous stellate ganglion block
T2 - the STAR study
AU - STAR study group
AU - Savastano, Simone
AU - Baldi, Enrico
AU - Compagnoni, Sara
AU - Rordorf, Roberto
AU - Sanzo, Antonio
AU - Gentile, Francesca Romana
AU - Dusi, Veronica
AU - Frea, Simone
AU - Gravinese, Carol
AU - Cauti, Filippo Maria
AU - Iannopollo, Gianmarco
AU - De Sensi, Francesco
AU - Gandolfi, Edoardo
AU - Frigerio, Laura
AU - Crea, Pasquale
AU - Zagari, Domenico
AU - Casula, Matteo
AU - Sangiorgi, Giuseppe
AU - Persampieri, Simone
AU - Dell’Era, Gabriele
AU - Patti, Giuseppe
AU - Colombo, Claudia
AU - Mugnai, Giacomo
AU - Notaristefano, Francesco
AU - Barengo, Alberto
AU - Falcetti, Roberta
AU - Perego, Giovanni Battista
AU - D’Angelo, Giuseppe
AU - Tanese, Nikita
AU - Currao, Alessia
AU - Sgromo, Vito
AU - De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
AU - Fasolino, Alessandro
AU - Bendotti, Sara
AU - Primi, Roberto
AU - Auricchio, Angelo
AU - Conte, Giulio
AU - Rossi, Pietro
AU - Angelini, Filippo
AU - Morena, Arianna
AU - Toscano, Antonio
AU - Carinci, Valeria
AU - Dattilo, Giuseppe
AU - Mancini, Nastasia
AU - Tritto, Massimo
AU - Corda, Marco
AU - Tola, Gianfranco
AU - Binaghi, Giulio
AU - Scudu, Claudia
AU - Barone, Lucy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2024/3/7
Y1 - 2024/3/7
N2 - Background and An electrical storm (ES) is a clinical emergency with a paucity of established treatment options. Despite initial encouraging Aims reports about the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous stellate ganglion block (PSGB), many questions remained unsettled and evidence from a prospective multicentre study was still lacking. For these purposes, the STAR study was designed. Methods This is a multicentre observational study enrolling patients suffering from an ES refractory to standard treatment from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction of treated arrhythmic events by at least 50% comparing the 12 h following PSGB with the 12 h before the procedure. STAR operators were specifically trained to both the anterior anatomical and the lateral ultrasound-guided approach. Results A total of 131 patients from 19 centres were enrolled and underwent 184 PSGBs. Patients were mainly male (83.2%) with a median age of 68 (63.8–69.2) years and a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (25.0 ± 12.3%). The primary outcome was reached in 92% of patients, and the median reduction of arrhythmic episodes between 12 h before and after PSGB was 100% (interquartile range −100% to −92.3%). Arrhythmic episodes requiring treatment were significantly reduced comparing 12 h before the first PSGB with 12 h after the last procedure [six (3–15.8) vs. 0 (0–1), P < .0001] and comparing 1 h before with 1 h after each procedure [2 (0–6) vs. 0 (0–0), P < .001]. One major complication occurred (0.5%).
AB - Background and An electrical storm (ES) is a clinical emergency with a paucity of established treatment options. Despite initial encouraging Aims reports about the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous stellate ganglion block (PSGB), many questions remained unsettled and evidence from a prospective multicentre study was still lacking. For these purposes, the STAR study was designed. Methods This is a multicentre observational study enrolling patients suffering from an ES refractory to standard treatment from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction of treated arrhythmic events by at least 50% comparing the 12 h following PSGB with the 12 h before the procedure. STAR operators were specifically trained to both the anterior anatomical and the lateral ultrasound-guided approach. Results A total of 131 patients from 19 centres were enrolled and underwent 184 PSGBs. Patients were mainly male (83.2%) with a median age of 68 (63.8–69.2) years and a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (25.0 ± 12.3%). The primary outcome was reached in 92% of patients, and the median reduction of arrhythmic episodes between 12 h before and after PSGB was 100% (interquartile range −100% to −92.3%). Arrhythmic episodes requiring treatment were significantly reduced comparing 12 h before the first PSGB with 12 h after the last procedure [six (3–15.8) vs. 0 (0–1), P < .0001] and comparing 1 h before with 1 h after each procedure [2 (0–6) vs. 0 (0–0), P < .001]. One major complication occurred (0.5%).
KW - Electrical storm
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Stellate ganglion block
KW - Ventricular tachycardia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185111611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae021
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae021
M3 - Article
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 45
SP - 823
EP - 833
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 10
ER -