TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in patients aged > 60 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
T2 - a 52-week multicenter, real-life study—IL AD (Italian Landscape Atopic Dermatitis)
AU - Potestio, Luca
AU - Patruno, Cataldo
AU - Narcisi, Alessandra
AU - Costanzo, Antonio
AU - Ibba, Luciano
AU - Gargiulo, Luigi
AU - Malagoli, Piergiorgio
AU - Ortoncelli, Michela
AU - Ribero, Simone
AU - Mastorino, Luca
AU - Leo, Francesco
AU - Ferrucci, Silvia Mariel
AU - Angileri, Luisa
AU - Barei, Francesca
AU - Stingeni, Luca
AU - Hansel, Katharina
AU - Sciarrone, Claudio
AU - Girolomoni, Giampiero
AU - Maurelli, Martina
AU - Foti, Caterina
AU - Tirone, Benedetta
AU - Balato, Anna
AU - Esposito, Maria
AU - Paolino, Giovanni
AU - Mercuri, Santo Raffaele
AU - Pezzolo, Elena
AU - Savoia, Paola
AU - Brescia, Claudio
AU - Napolitano, Maddalena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Atopic dermatitis (AD) prevalence in elderly patients is increasing. Clinically, elderly AD may present with atypical phenotypes, making the diagnosis difficult. Moreover, treatment challenges arise due to treatment-resistance, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and contraindications to existing therapies. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) may offer a valuable alternative. However, their use in elderly populations remains unclear, as older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, and several concerns have been raised about their safety in this category of subjects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe AD. A 52-week, multicenter, real-life study was performed enrolling patients aged ≥ 60 years affected by moderate-to-severe AD undergoing treatment with JAK inhibitors for at least 16 weeks across 16 dermatological centers in Italy. Disease severity was assessed at baseline, week (W) 4, 16, 24, and 52 using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at each follow-up. A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria [abrocitinib: 13 (18.06%); baricitinib: 6 (8.33%); upadacitinib: 53 (73.61%)]. Of these, 72 (100.0%) achieved W16 follow-up with 33 (45.83%) and 26 (36.11%) subjects reaching W24 and W52, respectively. At baseline, mean EASI, DLQI and P-NRS were 21.22 ± 10.38, 18.21 ± 7.33, and 7.84 ± 1.94, respectively. A significant improvement in all scores was observed starting from W4 [EASI: 4.77 ± 5.07, DLQI: 4.01 ± 3.98, P-NRS: 1.66 ± 1.83 (p < 0.0001 for all)], continuing to improve up to W52 [EASI: 0.81 ± 1.27, DLQI: 0.31 ± 0.63, P-NRS: 0.42 ± 1.03; (p < 0.0001 for all)]. No treatment interruptions or modifications for ineffectiveness or AEs were registered. No statistically significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety were found among the treatment groups. JAK inhibitors demonstrated significant efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in elderly AD patients.
AB - Atopic dermatitis (AD) prevalence in elderly patients is increasing. Clinically, elderly AD may present with atypical phenotypes, making the diagnosis difficult. Moreover, treatment challenges arise due to treatment-resistance, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and contraindications to existing therapies. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) may offer a valuable alternative. However, their use in elderly populations remains unclear, as older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, and several concerns have been raised about their safety in this category of subjects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe AD. A 52-week, multicenter, real-life study was performed enrolling patients aged ≥ 60 years affected by moderate-to-severe AD undergoing treatment with JAK inhibitors for at least 16 weeks across 16 dermatological centers in Italy. Disease severity was assessed at baseline, week (W) 4, 16, 24, and 52 using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at each follow-up. A total of 72 patients met the inclusion criteria [abrocitinib: 13 (18.06%); baricitinib: 6 (8.33%); upadacitinib: 53 (73.61%)]. Of these, 72 (100.0%) achieved W16 follow-up with 33 (45.83%) and 26 (36.11%) subjects reaching W24 and W52, respectively. At baseline, mean EASI, DLQI and P-NRS were 21.22 ± 10.38, 18.21 ± 7.33, and 7.84 ± 1.94, respectively. A significant improvement in all scores was observed starting from W4 [EASI: 4.77 ± 5.07, DLQI: 4.01 ± 3.98, P-NRS: 1.66 ± 1.83 (p < 0.0001 for all)], continuing to improve up to W52 [EASI: 0.81 ± 1.27, DLQI: 0.31 ± 0.63, P-NRS: 0.42 ± 1.03; (p < 0.0001 for all)]. No treatment interruptions or modifications for ineffectiveness or AEs were registered. No statistically significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety were found among the treatment groups. JAK inhibitors demonstrated significant efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in elderly AD patients.
KW - Abrocitinib
KW - Atopic dermatitis
KW - Baricitinib
KW - Elderly patients
KW - JAK inhibitors
KW - Management
KW - Upadacitinib
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005792081
U2 - 10.1007/s00403-025-04278-9
DO - 10.1007/s00403-025-04278-9
M3 - Article
SN - 0340-3696
VL - 317
JO - Archives of Dermatological Research
JF - Archives of Dermatological Research
IS - 1
M1 - 777
ER -