Salta alla navigazione principale Salta alla ricerca Salta al contenuto principale

Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in pretreated HER2-low metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Francesco Schettini
  • , Sabrina Nucera
  • , Tomás Pascual
  • , Olga Martínez-Sáez
  • , Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona
  • , Benedetta Conte
  • , Giuseppe Buono
  • , Matteo Lambertini
  • , Kevin Punie
  • , Juan Miguel Cejalvo
  • , Grazia Arpino
  • , Paolo Vigneri
  • , Daniele Generali
  • , Eva Ciruelos
  • , Javier Cortés
  • , Alessandra Gennari
  • , Montserrat Muñoz
  • , Maria J. Vidal Losada
  • , Sara M. Tolaney
  • , Aleix Prat
  • Guillermo Villacampa

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo di reviewpeer review

Abstract

Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab-govitecan (SG) provided significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) improvements over chemotherapy (CT) in pretreated hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and triple-negative (TN)/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, no direct comparison between the two exists, nor with the more recent datopotamab-deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare efficacy and safety of T-DXd and SG in CT-pretreated HR+ and TN/HER2-low MBC and assess their benefit over standard CT, exploring also a comparison with Dato-DXd. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for PFS/OS. P-score was used for treatment ranking. Results: Three RCTs (956 patients) were included in the primary analysis and 5 (1,445) in the exploratory NMA with Dato-DXd. In HR+/HER2-low, T-DXd showed no significant difference in PFS and OS when compared to SG. Similarly, in TN/HER2-low, PFS and OS did not differ significantly between the two ADCs. The P-score analysis favored T-DXd over SG in HR+/HER2-low in PFS (0.90 vs. 0.60) and OS (0.89 vs. 0.60). SG was favored over T-DXd in OS in TN/HER2-low (0.80 vs. 0.69). Similar results were obtained for HR+ MBC when including Dato-Dxd, which showed the worst performance, while T-DXd was the only ADC significantly outperforming CT in OS. The ADCs showed significantly better PFS and OS than CT in HR+/HER2-low and TN/HER2-low (all p < 0.001). SG had higher rates of neutropenia, diarrhea and alopecia vs. T-DXd, which showed more thrombocytopenia, fatigue and nausea. Pneumonitis and cardiotoxicity were typically T-DXd-related, and T-DXd showed more toxicity-related discontinuations. Conclusions: Similar efficacy with T-DXd and SG in HER2-low MBC was observed, regardless of HR status. Safety profile, local drug-approval criteria and guidelines, patients’ preferences and overall quality of evidence should ultimately guide therapeutic decision-making. Dato-DXd role remains uncertain.

Lingua originaleInglese
Numero di articolo102865
RivistaCancer Treatment Reviews
Volume132
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - gen 2025

OSS delle Nazioni Unite

Questo processo contribuisce al raggiungimento dei seguenti obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile

  1. SDG 3 - Salute e benessere
    SDG 3 Salute e benessere

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in pretreated HER2-low metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo