TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of oral bisphosphonates for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures
T2 - Evidence from the AIFA-BEST observational study
AU - Ghirardi, Arianna
AU - Di Bari, Mauro
AU - Zambon, Antonella
AU - Scotti, Lorenza
AU - Della Vedova, Gianluca
AU - Lapi, Francesco
AU - Cipriani, Francesco
AU - Caputi, Achille P.
AU - Vaccheri, Alberto
AU - Gregori, Dario
AU - Gesuita, Rosaria
AU - Vestri, Annarita
AU - Staniscia, Tommaso
AU - Mazzaglia, Giampiero
AU - Corrao, Giovanni
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This study was almost entirely funded by a research grant from the AIFA—the Italian Medicines Agency—(AIFA grant FARM06R9YY), Rome, Italy. Data analyses were performed at the Unit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Statistics, University of Milano-Bicocca, with grants from the Italian Minister for University and Research (’Fondo d’Ateneo per la Ricerca’ portion, year 2010). The authors thank Mrs. Ann Georgina Rhodes for editorial assistance. Author’s roles: study design: GM and GC. Data collection: LS, FL, AlV, DG, RG, AnV, TS. Data analysis: AG, AZ. Data interpretation: AG, AZ, MDB, and GC. Drafting manuscript: AG, AZ, MDB, and GC. Revising manuscript content: AG, MDB and GC. Approving final version of manuscript: AG, MDB, AZ, LS, GDV, FL, FC, APC, AV, DG, RG, AV, TS, GM, and GC. AG, MDB and GC take responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Purpose: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of the bone, whose incidence increases progressively with aging. The main consequences of osteoporosis are fragility fractures, which have considerable medical, social, and economic implications. Adequate treatment of osteoporosis must be considered as a compelling public health intervention. Bisphosphonates (BPs) represent the most significant advance in this field in the past decade, and they are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. However, evidence for their effectiveness is limited to secondary prevention, whereas their effect in primary prevention is uncertain and needs further investigation. Methods: Using administrative data collected in the "Biphosphonates Efficacy-Safety Tradeoff" (BEST) study, a nested case-control study was conducted by including 56,058 participants, aged 55 years who were started on oral BPs from 2003 to 2005. Cases were the 1,710 participants who were hospitalized for osteoporotic fractures until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio of fracture associated with categories of treatment duration. Results: Compared with participants assuming BPs for less than 1 year, those who remained on therapy for at least 2 years had a 21 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 7 to 33 %) fracture risk reduction. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that BPs, dispensed for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures after at least 2 years of treatment.
AB - Purpose: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of the bone, whose incidence increases progressively with aging. The main consequences of osteoporosis are fragility fractures, which have considerable medical, social, and economic implications. Adequate treatment of osteoporosis must be considered as a compelling public health intervention. Bisphosphonates (BPs) represent the most significant advance in this field in the past decade, and they are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. However, evidence for their effectiveness is limited to secondary prevention, whereas their effect in primary prevention is uncertain and needs further investigation. Methods: Using administrative data collected in the "Biphosphonates Efficacy-Safety Tradeoff" (BEST) study, a nested case-control study was conducted by including 56,058 participants, aged 55 years who were started on oral BPs from 2003 to 2005. Cases were the 1,710 participants who were hospitalized for osteoporotic fractures until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio of fracture associated with categories of treatment duration. Results: Compared with participants assuming BPs for less than 1 year, those who remained on therapy for at least 2 years had a 21 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 7 to 33 %) fracture risk reduction. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that BPs, dispensed for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures after at least 2 years of treatment.
KW - Bisphosphonates
KW - Databases
KW - Fracture prevention
KW - Nested case-control
KW - Osteoporosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84906234941
U2 - 10.1007/s00228-014-1708-8
DO - 10.1007/s00228-014-1708-8
M3 - Article
SN - 0031-6970
VL - 70
SP - 1129
EP - 1137
JO - European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
JF - European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
IS - 9
ER -