TY - JOUR
T1 - Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in oldest-old patients: a propensity score matched analysis of a nationwide registry
AU - DI MARTINO, MARCELLO
AU - Álvaro, Gancedo Quintana
AU - Víctor, Vaello Jodra
AU - Alfonso, Sanjuanbenito Dehesa
AU - Dieter, Morales García
AU - Rubén, Caiña Ruiz
AU - Francisca, García-Moreno Nisa
AU - Fernando, Mendoza-Moreno
AU - Sara, Alonso Batanero
AU - Edecio, Quiñones Sampedro José
AU - Paola, Lora Cumplido
AU - Altea, Arango Bravo
AU - Ines, Rubio-Perez
AU - Luis, Asensio-Gomez
AU - Fernando, Pardo Aranda
AU - Sara, Sentí Farrarons
AU - Cristina, Ruiz Moreno
AU - Maria, Martinez Moreno Clara
AU - Aingeru, Sarriugarte Lasarte
AU - Mikel, Prieto Calvo
AU - Daniel, Aparicio-Sánchez
AU - Perea, Perea Del Pozo Eduardo
AU - Gianluca, Pellino
AU - Elena, Martin-Perez
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The role of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in "oldest-old" patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of ELC for ACC in ≥ 85-year-old patients. Multicentric retrospective study that analysed data of patients who underwent ELC for ACC between 2013 and 2018. Patients ≥ 85-year-old (oldest-old patients) were compared with younger patients, before and after propensity score matching (PSM). The main outcomes were mortality, post-operative complications, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. The study included 1670 patients. The unmatched comparison revealed a selection bias towards the oldest-old group, which was associated with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (5 vs 1, p < 0.001), more ASA III/IV subjects (54.2% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001), class II/III ACC (80.1% vs 69.1%, p = 0.016) and higher Chole-Risk Score (p > 0.001). The oldest-old also required more conversion to open surgery (20% vs 10.3%, p = 0.005). Postoperatively, they had a higher 90-day mortality rate (7.6% vs 1%, p < 0.001), more total complications (40.6% vs 17.7%, p < 0.001), complications ≥ IIIa Clavien-Dindo (14.4% vs 5.8%, p = 0.002), longer LOS (6 vs 5 days, p < 0.001), and more readmissions (6.6% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001). After PSM (n = 206), the two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics and intraoperative outcomes. No differences were observed in post-operative complications; bile leak; incisional, intrabdominal, urinary or respiratory tract infections; LOS or readmissions. In the oldest-old, ELC for ACC is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, it seems to be safe in selected patients. Therefore, age itself should not be regarded as a contraindication to ELC for ACC.
AB - The role of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) in "oldest-old" patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of ELC for ACC in ≥ 85-year-old patients. Multicentric retrospective study that analysed data of patients who underwent ELC for ACC between 2013 and 2018. Patients ≥ 85-year-old (oldest-old patients) were compared with younger patients, before and after propensity score matching (PSM). The main outcomes were mortality, post-operative complications, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. The study included 1670 patients. The unmatched comparison revealed a selection bias towards the oldest-old group, which was associated with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (5 vs 1, p < 0.001), more ASA III/IV subjects (54.2% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001), class II/III ACC (80.1% vs 69.1%, p = 0.016) and higher Chole-Risk Score (p > 0.001). The oldest-old also required more conversion to open surgery (20% vs 10.3%, p = 0.005). Postoperatively, they had a higher 90-day mortality rate (7.6% vs 1%, p < 0.001), more total complications (40.6% vs 17.7%, p < 0.001), complications ≥ IIIa Clavien-Dindo (14.4% vs 5.8%, p = 0.002), longer LOS (6 vs 5 days, p < 0.001), and more readmissions (6.6% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001). After PSM (n = 206), the two groups were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics and intraoperative outcomes. No differences were observed in post-operative complications; bile leak; incisional, intrabdominal, urinary or respiratory tract infections; LOS or readmissions. In the oldest-old, ELC for ACC is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, it seems to be safe in selected patients. Therefore, age itself should not be regarded as a contraindication to ELC for ACC.
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/198142
U2 - 10.1007/s13304-022-01254-0
DO - 10.1007/s13304-022-01254-0
M3 - Article
SN - 2038-3312
VL - 18
SP - 1607
EP - 1617
JO - Updates in Surgery
JF - Updates in Surgery
IS - 1
ER -