TY - JOUR
T1 - Drugs price and reimbursement regulation
T2 - comparators, endpoints and role of the cost-effectiveness
AU - Jommi, Claudio
AU - Apolone, Giovanni
AU - Scroccaro, Giovanna
AU - Acciai, Valentina
AU - Addis, Antonio
AU - Ardizzoni, Andrea
AU - Bernardini, Renato
AU - Bortolami, Alberto
AU - Brigido, Alessia
AU - Buzzetti, Giuliano
AU - Canonico, Pier Luigi
AU - Caprari, Francesca
AU - Centanni, Stefano
AU - Cernetti, Chiara
AU - Cicchetti, Americo
AU - Corsico, Giorgio
AU - Damele, Francesco
AU - de Braud, Filippo
AU - Manurita, Sara
AU - Mennini, Francesco Saverio
AU - Olivi, Irene
AU - Parretta, Federica
AU - Pippo, Lara
AU - Pulimeno, Stefania
AU - Riccaboni, Massimo
AU - Rossi, Giuseppe
AU - Saleri, Cecilia
AU - Sinibaldi, Alessandra
AU - Spandonaro, Federico
AU - Stefenoni, Cristian
AU - Visentin, Elena
AU - Viale, Pierluigi
AU - Zapparelli, Giuseppina
AU - Popoli, Patrizia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - This document illustrates the results of a discussion of two multi-disciplinary expert panels on pricing and reimbursement of medicines. Experts work in different organizations. The discussion focused on comparator(s), endpoint(s), negotiation of prices of new medicines and/or indications to include in the List 648, as well as the role of cost-effectiveness in the price and reimbursement negotiation. The debate took place during the fourth edition of the Seminari di Mogliano, organized on the 30th of September/lst of October, 2021. The two panels agreed on a general need to enhance interaction among the different stakeholders, in the early assessment and negotiation phases, and to increase the transparency/reproducibility of the decisions taken. The experts have also emphasized the need (i) to improve clarity in the evaluation of additional therapeutic value and the place in therapy with respect to comparators and how comparators are identified; (ii) to create work groups to identify the most appropriate endpoint(s), for each therapeutic area and level of unmet needs; (iii) to provide for a systematic use of cost-effectiveness when an added therapeutic value is delivered by a new medicine. With regard to the 648 List, the experts advocated for an overall reorganization of the current rules governing the special uses of drugs.
AB - This document illustrates the results of a discussion of two multi-disciplinary expert panels on pricing and reimbursement of medicines. Experts work in different organizations. The discussion focused on comparator(s), endpoint(s), negotiation of prices of new medicines and/or indications to include in the List 648, as well as the role of cost-effectiveness in the price and reimbursement negotiation. The debate took place during the fourth edition of the Seminari di Mogliano, organized on the 30th of September/lst of October, 2021. The two panels agreed on a general need to enhance interaction among the different stakeholders, in the early assessment and negotiation phases, and to increase the transparency/reproducibility of the decisions taken. The experts have also emphasized the need (i) to improve clarity in the evaluation of additional therapeutic value and the place in therapy with respect to comparators and how comparators are identified; (ii) to create work groups to identify the most appropriate endpoint(s), for each therapeutic area and level of unmet needs; (iii) to provide for a systematic use of cost-effectiveness when an added therapeutic value is delivered by a new medicine. With regard to the 648 List, the experts advocated for an overall reorganization of the current rules governing the special uses of drugs.
KW - 648 List
KW - Comparators
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Endpoints
KW - Price and reimbursement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174986872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.33393/grhta.2022.2475
DO - 10.33393/grhta.2022.2475
M3 - Article
SN - 2284-2403
VL - 9
SP - 99
EP - 104
JO - GLOBAL AND REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
JF - GLOBAL AND REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
ER -