Diaphragmatic Kinetics Assessment by Tissue Doppler Imaging and Extubation Outcome

  • Gianmaria Cammarota
  • , Ester Boniolo
  • , Erminio Santangelo
  • , Nello De Vita
  • , Federico Verdina
  • , Samuele Crudo
  • , Ilaria Sguazzotti
  • , Raffaella Perucca
  • , Antonio Messina
  • , Marta Zanoni
  • , Danila Azzolina
  • , Paolo Navalesi
  • , Federico Longhini
  • , Luigi Vetrugno
  • , Elena Bignami
  • , Francesco della Corte
  • , Riccardo Tarquini
  • , Edoardo De Robertis
  • , Rosanna Vaschetto

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics through tissue Doppler imaging (dTDI) was recently proposed as a means to describe diaphragmatic activity in both healthy individuals and intubated patients undergoing weaning from mechanical ventilation. Our primary aim was to inves-tigate whether the diaphragmatic excursion velocity measured with dTDI at the end of a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) was different in subjects successfully extubated versus those who passed the trial but exhibited extubation failure within 48 h after extubation. METHODS: We enrolled 100 adult subjects, all of whom had successfully passed a 30-min SBT conducted in CPAP of 5 cm H2O. In cases of extubation failure within 48 h after liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation, subjects were re-intubated or supported through noninvasive ventilation. dTDI was performed at the end of the SBT to assess excursion, velocity, and acceleration. RESULTS: Extubation was successful in 79 subjects, whereas it failed in 21 subjects. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) inspiratory peak excursion velocity (3.1 [IQR 2.0–4.3] vs 1.8 [1.3–2.6] cm/s, P <.001), mean velocity (1.6 [IQR 1.2–2.4] vs 1.1 [IQR 0.8–1.4] cm/s, P <.001), and acceleration (8.8 [IQR 5.0–17.8] vs 4.2 [IQR 2.4– 8.0] cm/s2, P =.002) were all significantly higher in subjects who failed extubation compared with those who were successfully extubated. Similarly, the median expiratory peak relaxation velocity (2.6 [IQR 1.9–4.5] vs 1.8 [IQR 1.2–2.5] cm/s, P <.001), mean velocity (1.1 [IQR 0.7–1.7] vs 0.9 [IQR 0.6– 1.0] cm/s, P =.002), and acceleration (11.2 [IQR 9.1–19.0] vs 7.1 [IQR 4.6–12.0] cm/s2, P =.004) were also higher in the subjects who failed extubation. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, at the end of SBT, subjects who developed extubation failure within 48 h after extubation experienced a greater diaphragmatic activation compared with subjects who were successfully extubated. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03962322.).

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)983-993
Numero di pagine11
RivistaRespiratory Care
Volume66
Numero di pubblicazione6
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 1 giu 2021

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Diaphragmatic Kinetics Assessment by Tissue Doppler Imaging and Extubation Outcome'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo