TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic effectiveness of [18F]Fluoroestradiol PET/CT in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
T2 - the key role of histopathology. Evidence from an international multicentre prospective study
AU - Bottoni, Gianluca
AU - Fiz, Francesco
AU - Puntoni, Matteo
AU - Matteucci, Federica
AU - Monti, Manuela
AU - DeCensi, Andrea
AU - Nanni, Oriana
AU - Brain, Etienne
AU - Alberini, Jean Louis
AU - Dib, Bassam
AU - Sacchetti, Gianmauro
AU - Trimboli, Pierpaolo
AU - Treglia, Giorgio
AU - Harbeck, Nadia
AU - Sola, Simona
AU - Gennari, Alessandra
AU - Piccardo, Arnoldo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Introduction: [18F]Fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) PET/CT has been proposed as a tool for detecting the oestrogen receptor density in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) non-invasively across all disease localizations. However, its diagnostic potential in terms of the detection rate (DR) of metastases is unclear. In this study, we pitted this method against [18F]FDG PET/CT and tried to identify predictors of the diagnostic superiority of the [18F] FES-based method. Materials and methods: From a multicentre database, we enrolled all patients with metastatic BC who had undergone both [18F]FES PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT. Two readers assessed both images independently and used a patient-based (PBA) and lesion-based analysis (LBA) to calculate the DR. Pathology-related and clinical factors were tested as predictors of [18F]FES PET/CT superiority using a multivariate model. Results: 92 patients, bearing a total of 2678 metastases, were enrolled. On PBA, the DR of [18F]FDG and [18F]FES PET/CT was 97% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.018). On LBA, the [18F]FES method proved more sensitive than [18F]FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes, bone, lung and soft tissue (p < 0.01). This greater sensitivity was associated with lobular histology, both on PBA (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.4, 95%CI 1.0–12.3) and on LBA (OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.2–16.1 for lymph node metastases and OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.1–10.2 for bone localizations). Conclusions: The overall DR of [18F]FES PET/CT appears to be lower than that of [18F]FDG PET/CT on PBA. However, the [18F]FES method, if positive, can identify more lesions than [18F]FDG at most sites. The higher sensitivity of [18F]FES PET/CT was associated with lobular histology.
AB - Introduction: [18F]Fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) PET/CT has been proposed as a tool for detecting the oestrogen receptor density in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) non-invasively across all disease localizations. However, its diagnostic potential in terms of the detection rate (DR) of metastases is unclear. In this study, we pitted this method against [18F]FDG PET/CT and tried to identify predictors of the diagnostic superiority of the [18F] FES-based method. Materials and methods: From a multicentre database, we enrolled all patients with metastatic BC who had undergone both [18F]FES PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT. Two readers assessed both images independently and used a patient-based (PBA) and lesion-based analysis (LBA) to calculate the DR. Pathology-related and clinical factors were tested as predictors of [18F]FES PET/CT superiority using a multivariate model. Results: 92 patients, bearing a total of 2678 metastases, were enrolled. On PBA, the DR of [18F]FDG and [18F]FES PET/CT was 97% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.018). On LBA, the [18F]FES method proved more sensitive than [18F]FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes, bone, lung and soft tissue (p < 0.01). This greater sensitivity was associated with lobular histology, both on PBA (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.4, 95%CI 1.0–12.3) and on LBA (OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.2–16.1 for lymph node metastases and OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.1–10.2 for bone localizations). Conclusions: The overall DR of [18F]FES PET/CT appears to be lower than that of [18F]FDG PET/CT on PBA. However, the [18F]FES method, if positive, can identify more lesions than [18F]FDG at most sites. The higher sensitivity of [18F]FES PET/CT was associated with lobular histology.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Estrogen receptor
KW - FDG
KW - FES
KW - Lobular histology
KW - Nuclear medicine
KW - PET
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149311772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-023-06173-9
DO - 10.1007/s00259-023-06173-9
M3 - Article
SN - 1619-7070
VL - 50
SP - 2477
EP - 2485
JO - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
JF - European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
IS - 8
ER -