TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a model care pathway for adults undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
T2 - Evidence-based key interventions and indicators
AU - van Zelm, Ruben
AU - Janssen, Ingrid
AU - Vanhaecht, Kris
AU - de Buck van Overstraeten, Anthony
AU - Panella, Massimiliano
AU - Sermeus, Walter
AU - Coeckelberghs, Ellen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Rationale, aims, and objectives: During the last decades, perioperative care for patients with colorectal cancer has shifted towards more standardized care, so-called “enhanced recovery after surgery.” Those programs aim to optimize interventions in perioperative care to decrease the rate of postoperative complications, improve patients' recovery, and shorten hospital stay. The purpose of this literature review is to identify, summarize, and operationalize the clinical content of both key interventions and clinical indicators to develop an evidence-based model pathway for surgical patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: A systematic search in 3 databases was conducted to identify key interventions (KIs) and indicators to measure the effect of implementation of care pathways. The KIs from the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol were listed and used as framework to identify and match KIs used in the included studies. The Clinical Pathway Compass was used to categorize the indicators. Results: Fifteen studies were included. The number of KI used in the study protocols ranged from 9 to 20. In total, 33 KIs were identified. Little information was available concerning the implementation of and compliance to the protocol. Length of stay and complication rate are the most common used indicators (used in 15/15 and 14/15 of the studies), followed by 21 other measures. All but one of the included studies reported a reduction in length of stay. Conclusion: There is a considerable variation in both number of KIs and indicators as well as operationalization of key interventions, for surgical patients with colorectal cancer documented in literature. Therefore, we summarized the input from different studies and developed an evidence-based model pathway, which can serve as a basis for a local/regional care pathway team to build their own pathway.
AB - Rationale, aims, and objectives: During the last decades, perioperative care for patients with colorectal cancer has shifted towards more standardized care, so-called “enhanced recovery after surgery.” Those programs aim to optimize interventions in perioperative care to decrease the rate of postoperative complications, improve patients' recovery, and shorten hospital stay. The purpose of this literature review is to identify, summarize, and operationalize the clinical content of both key interventions and clinical indicators to develop an evidence-based model pathway for surgical patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: A systematic search in 3 databases was conducted to identify key interventions (KIs) and indicators to measure the effect of implementation of care pathways. The KIs from the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol were listed and used as framework to identify and match KIs used in the included studies. The Clinical Pathway Compass was used to categorize the indicators. Results: Fifteen studies were included. The number of KI used in the study protocols ranged from 9 to 20. In total, 33 KIs were identified. Little information was available concerning the implementation of and compliance to the protocol. Length of stay and complication rate are the most common used indicators (used in 15/15 and 14/15 of the studies), followed by 21 other measures. All but one of the included studies reported a reduction in length of stay. Conclusion: There is a considerable variation in both number of KIs and indicators as well as operationalization of key interventions, for surgical patients with colorectal cancer documented in literature. Therefore, we summarized the input from different studies and developed an evidence-based model pathway, which can serve as a basis for a local/regional care pathway team to build their own pathway.
KW - care pathway
KW - clinical pathway
KW - colorectal surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029567633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jep.12700
DO - 10.1111/jep.12700
M3 - Review article
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 24
SP - 232
EP - 239
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 1
ER -