Development and validation of a simplified score to predict early relapse in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in a pooled dataset of 2,190 patients

  • Gian Maria Zaccaria
  • , Luca Bertamini
  • , Maria Teresa Petrucci
  • , Massimo Offidani
  • , Paolo Corradini
  • , Andrea Capra
  • , Alessandra Romano
  • , Anna Marina Liberati
  • , Donato Mannina
  • , Paolo de Fabritiis
  • , Nicola Cascavilla
  • , Marina Ruggeri
  • , Roberto Mina
  • , Francesca Patriarca
  • , Giulia Benevolo
  • , Angelo Belotti
  • , Gianluca Gaidano
  • , Arnon Nagler
  • , Roman Hajek
  • , Andrew Spencer
  • Pieter Sonneveld, Pellegrino Musto, Mario Boccadoro, Francesca Gay

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the improvement of therapeutic regimens, several patients with multiple myeloma (MM) still experience early relapse (ER). This subset of patients currently represents an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: We pooled data from seven European multicenter phase II/III clinical trials enrolling 2,190 patients with newly diagnosed MM from 2003 to 2017. Baseline patient evaluation included 14 clinically relevant features. Patients with complete data (n = 1,218) were split into training (n = 844) and validation sets (n = 374). In the training set, a univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model on ER within 18 months (ER18) were made. The most accurate model was selected on the validation set. We also developed a dynamic version of the score by including response to treatment. Results: The Simplified Early Relapse in Multiple Myeloma (S-ERMM) score was modeled on six features weighted by a score: 5 points for high lactate dehydrogenase or t(4;14); 3 for del17p, abnormal albumin, or bone marrow plasma cells >60%; and 2 for l free light chain. The S-ERMM identified three patient groups with different risks of ER18: Intermediate (Int) versus Low (OR = 2.39, P < 0.001) and High versus Low (OR = 5.59, P < 0.001). S-ERMM High/Int patients had significantly shorter overall survival (High vs. Low: HR = 3.24, P < 0.001; Int vs. Low: HR = 1.86, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival-2 (High vs. Low: HR = 2.89, P < 0.001; Int vs. Low: HR = 1.76, P < 0.001) than S-ERMM Low. The Dynamic S-ERMM (DS-ERMM) modulated the prognostic power of the S-ERMM. Conclusions: On the basis of simple, widely available baseline features, the S-ERMM and DS-ERMM properly identified patients with different risks of ER and survival outcomes.

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)3695-3703
Numero di pagine9
RivistaClinical Cancer Research
Volume27
Numero di pubblicazione13
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 1 lug 2021

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Development and validation of a simplified score to predict early relapse in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in a pooled dataset of 2,190 patients'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo