TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a simplified score to predict early relapse in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in a pooled dataset of 2,190 patients
AU - Zaccaria, Gian Maria
AU - Bertamini, Luca
AU - Petrucci, Maria Teresa
AU - Offidani, Massimo
AU - Corradini, Paolo
AU - Capra, Andrea
AU - Romano, Alessandra
AU - Liberati, Anna Marina
AU - Mannina, Donato
AU - de Fabritiis, Paolo
AU - Cascavilla, Nicola
AU - Ruggeri, Marina
AU - Mina, Roberto
AU - Patriarca, Francesca
AU - Benevolo, Giulia
AU - Belotti, Angelo
AU - Gaidano, Gianluca
AU - Nagler, Arnon
AU - Hajek, Roman
AU - Spencer, Andrew
AU - Sonneveld, Pieter
AU - Musto, Pellegrino
AU - Boccadoro, Mario
AU - Gay, Francesca
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Purpose: Despite the improvement of therapeutic regimens, several patients with multiple myeloma (MM) still experience early relapse (ER). This subset of patients currently represents an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: We pooled data from seven European multicenter phase II/III clinical trials enrolling 2,190 patients with newly diagnosed MM from 2003 to 2017. Baseline patient evaluation included 14 clinically relevant features. Patients with complete data (n = 1,218) were split into training (n = 844) and validation sets (n = 374). In the training set, a univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model on ER within 18 months (ER18) were made. The most accurate model was selected on the validation set. We also developed a dynamic version of the score by including response to treatment. Results: The Simplified Early Relapse in Multiple Myeloma (S-ERMM) score was modeled on six features weighted by a score: 5 points for high lactate dehydrogenase or t(4;14); 3 for del17p, abnormal albumin, or bone marrow plasma cells >60%; and 2 for l free light chain. The S-ERMM identified three patient groups with different risks of ER18: Intermediate (Int) versus Low (OR = 2.39, P < 0.001) and High versus Low (OR = 5.59, P < 0.001). S-ERMM High/Int patients had significantly shorter overall survival (High vs. Low: HR = 3.24, P < 0.001; Int vs. Low: HR = 1.86, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival-2 (High vs. Low: HR = 2.89, P < 0.001; Int vs. Low: HR = 1.76, P < 0.001) than S-ERMM Low. The Dynamic S-ERMM (DS-ERMM) modulated the prognostic power of the S-ERMM. Conclusions: On the basis of simple, widely available baseline features, the S-ERMM and DS-ERMM properly identified patients with different risks of ER and survival outcomes.
AB - Purpose: Despite the improvement of therapeutic regimens, several patients with multiple myeloma (MM) still experience early relapse (ER). This subset of patients currently represents an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: We pooled data from seven European multicenter phase II/III clinical trials enrolling 2,190 patients with newly diagnosed MM from 2003 to 2017. Baseline patient evaluation included 14 clinically relevant features. Patients with complete data (n = 1,218) were split into training (n = 844) and validation sets (n = 374). In the training set, a univariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression model on ER within 18 months (ER18) were made. The most accurate model was selected on the validation set. We also developed a dynamic version of the score by including response to treatment. Results: The Simplified Early Relapse in Multiple Myeloma (S-ERMM) score was modeled on six features weighted by a score: 5 points for high lactate dehydrogenase or t(4;14); 3 for del17p, abnormal albumin, or bone marrow plasma cells >60%; and 2 for l free light chain. The S-ERMM identified three patient groups with different risks of ER18: Intermediate (Int) versus Low (OR = 2.39, P < 0.001) and High versus Low (OR = 5.59, P < 0.001). S-ERMM High/Int patients had significantly shorter overall survival (High vs. Low: HR = 3.24, P < 0.001; Int vs. Low: HR = 1.86, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival-2 (High vs. Low: HR = 2.89, P < 0.001; Int vs. Low: HR = 1.76, P < 0.001) than S-ERMM Low. The Dynamic S-ERMM (DS-ERMM) modulated the prognostic power of the S-ERMM. Conclusions: On the basis of simple, widely available baseline features, the S-ERMM and DS-ERMM properly identified patients with different risks of ER and survival outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109183622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0134
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0134
M3 - Article
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 27
SP - 3695
EP - 3703
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 13
ER -