TY - JOUR
T1 - Cumulative radiation exposure from radiological imaging in patients with Hodgkin and diffuse large b-cell lymphoma not submitted to radiotherapy
AU - Brambilla, Marco
AU - Matheoud, Roberta
AU - Margiotta-Casaluci, Gloria
AU - Cannillo, Barbara
AU - D'Alessio, Andrea
AU - Siciliano, Chiara
AU - CARRIERO, Alessandro
AU - GAIDANO, Gianluca
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective: To assess the cumulated exposure to radiation due to imaging in Hodgkin (HL) and diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphoma patients who were not submitted to radiotherapy. Methods: The study population included 51 and 83 adult patients with HL and DLBCL, with a follow-up duration >1 year. The cumulated exposure was expressed using patient-specific data as cumulated effective dose (CED). Results: Fifty-one HL patients (median age 47 years) were followed for a median of 3.5 years. The median total CED per subject was 104 mSv. CT and PET/CT examinations accounted for 75 and 25% of the total CED, respectively. 26 patients (49%) had a total CED ≥ 100 mSv and the maximum CED was 302 mSv. Eighty-three DLBCL patients (median age 66 years) were followed for a median of 3.7 years. The median total CED per subject over the study period was 134 mSv. CT and PET/CT for 86% and 13% of the total CED, respectively. 56 patients (67%) had a total CED ≥100 mSv. The maximum CED was 557 mSv. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the large number of imaging procedures performed for patients with lymphoma. Overall, 61% of the patients accrued a CED ≥ 100 mSv. Imaging policies were only in a partial agreement with current international guidelines. Advances in knowledge: The cumulated exposure radiation exposure may be of concern in HL patients and the contribution of CT procedures to the total CED is significant. The standardisation of clinical guidelines for managing patients with lymphoma is warranted.
AB - Objective: To assess the cumulated exposure to radiation due to imaging in Hodgkin (HL) and diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) lymphoma patients who were not submitted to radiotherapy. Methods: The study population included 51 and 83 adult patients with HL and DLBCL, with a follow-up duration >1 year. The cumulated exposure was expressed using patient-specific data as cumulated effective dose (CED). Results: Fifty-one HL patients (median age 47 years) were followed for a median of 3.5 years. The median total CED per subject was 104 mSv. CT and PET/CT examinations accounted for 75 and 25% of the total CED, respectively. 26 patients (49%) had a total CED ≥ 100 mSv and the maximum CED was 302 mSv. Eighty-three DLBCL patients (median age 66 years) were followed for a median of 3.7 years. The median total CED per subject over the study period was 134 mSv. CT and PET/CT for 86% and 13% of the total CED, respectively. 56 patients (67%) had a total CED ≥100 mSv. The maximum CED was 557 mSv. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated the large number of imaging procedures performed for patients with lymphoma. Overall, 61% of the patients accrued a CED ≥ 100 mSv. Imaging policies were only in a partial agreement with current international guidelines. Advances in knowledge: The cumulated exposure radiation exposure may be of concern in HL patients and the contribution of CT procedures to the total CED is significant. The standardisation of clinical guidelines for managing patients with lymphoma is warranted.
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/163442
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20230106
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20230106
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 96
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1149
ER -