TY - JOUR
T1 - Covid-19 and clinical-epidemiological research in italy: Proposal of a research agenda on priority topics by the italian association of epidemiology
AU - Ciccone, G.
AU - Deandrea, S.
AU - Clavenna, A.
AU - Kirchmayer, U.
AU - Simeon, V.
AU - Acampora, A.
AU - Agabiti, N.
AU - Angelici, L.
AU - Banzi, R.
AU - Cadum, E.
AU - Castiglione, A.
AU - Chiodini, P.
AU - Colombo, C.
AU - Ferroni, E.
AU - Migliore, E.
AU - Nistico, L.
AU - Pagano, E.
AU - Sabelli, A. M.
AU - SACERDOTE, Carlotta
AU - Silvestri, C.
AU - Soldati, S.
AU - Stranges, S.
AU - Tirani, M.
AU - Davoli, M.
AU - Galassi, C.
AU - Forastiere, F.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - BACKGROUND: the Covid-19 pandemic has provoked a huge of clinical and epidemiological research initiatives, especially in the most involved countries. However, this very large effort was characterized by several methodological weak-nesses, both in the field of discovering effective treatments (with too many small and uncontrolled trials) and in the field of identifying preventable risks and prognostic factors (with too few large, representative and well-designed cohorts or case-control studies). OBJECTIVES: in response to the fragmented and uncoor-dinated research production on Covid-19, the Italian Association of Epidemiology (AIE) stimulated the formation of a working group (WG) with the aims of identifying the most important gaps in knowledge and to propose a structured research agenda of clinical and epidemiological studies con-sidered at high priority on Covid-19, including recommendations on the preferable methodology. METHODS: the WG was composed by 25 subjects, main-ly epidemiologists, statisticians, and other experts in specific fields, who have voluntarily agreed to the proposal. The agreement on a list of main research questions and on the structure of the specific documents to be produced were defined through few meetings and cycles of document ex-changes. RESULTS: twelve main research questions on Covid-19 were identified, covering aetiology, prognosis, interventions, follow-up and impact on general and specific populations (children, pregnant women). For each of them, a two-page form was developed, structured in: background, main topics, methods (with recommendations on preferred study design and warn-ings for bias prevention) and an essential bibliography. CONCLUSIONS: this research agenda represents an initial contribution to direct clinical and epidemiological research efforts on high priority topics with a focus on methodological aspects. Further development and refinements of this agenda by Public Health Authorities are encouraged.
AB - BACKGROUND: the Covid-19 pandemic has provoked a huge of clinical and epidemiological research initiatives, especially in the most involved countries. However, this very large effort was characterized by several methodological weak-nesses, both in the field of discovering effective treatments (with too many small and uncontrolled trials) and in the field of identifying preventable risks and prognostic factors (with too few large, representative and well-designed cohorts or case-control studies). OBJECTIVES: in response to the fragmented and uncoor-dinated research production on Covid-19, the Italian Association of Epidemiology (AIE) stimulated the formation of a working group (WG) with the aims of identifying the most important gaps in knowledge and to propose a structured research agenda of clinical and epidemiological studies con-sidered at high priority on Covid-19, including recommendations on the preferable methodology. METHODS: the WG was composed by 25 subjects, main-ly epidemiologists, statisticians, and other experts in specific fields, who have voluntarily agreed to the proposal. The agreement on a list of main research questions and on the structure of the specific documents to be produced were defined through few meetings and cycles of document ex-changes. RESULTS: twelve main research questions on Covid-19 were identified, covering aetiology, prognosis, interventions, follow-up and impact on general and specific populations (children, pregnant women). For each of them, a two-page form was developed, structured in: background, main topics, methods (with recommendations on preferred study design and warn-ings for bias prevention) and an essential bibliography. CONCLUSIONS: this research agenda represents an initial contribution to direct clinical and epidemiological research efforts on high priority topics with a focus on methodological aspects. Further development and refinements of this agenda by Public Health Authorities are encouraged.
KW - Coronavirus infections
KW - Epidemiologic methods
KW - Evidence-based emergency medicine
KW - Health services research
KW - Pandemics
KW - Prevention and control
KW - Coronavirus infections
KW - Epidemiologic methods
KW - Evidence-based emergency medicine
KW - Health services research
KW - Pandemics
KW - Prevention and control
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/199674
U2 - 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.103
DO - 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.103
M3 - Articolo in rivista
SN - 1120-9763
VL - 44
SP - 51
EP - 59
JO - Epidemiologia e prevenzione
JF - Epidemiologia e prevenzione
IS - 5-6
ER -