Comparison of a blocking vs. a flare-up protocol in poor responders with a normal and abnormal clomiphene citrate challenge test

P. Anserini, A. Magnasco, V. Remorgida, G. Gaggero, D. Testa, G. L. Capitanio

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

This study aimed to standardize the clomiphene citrate test (CC-t) in our laboratory while comparing two different protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders. One hundred and forty-four patients scheduled for assisted reproductive techniques were submitted to the CC-t within 3 months before starting stimulation; 133 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with a blocking protocol. Poor responders in the first cycle (n = 30) were subsequently treated with a flare-up protocol. Although it was not statistically significant, more patients reached oocyte retrieval with the flare-up protocol. In the completed cycles, more gonadotrophin ampules (55 ± 15 vs. 34 ± 13; p < 0.001) and more stimulation days (12.6 ± 1 vs. 11.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.005) were needed in the blocking than in the flare-up protocol. No difference was observed in peak 17β-estradiol levels, preovulatory follicles, oocytes retrieved or pregnancy rate between the two protocols. According to the threshold values, established on CC-t of patients who obtained a clinical pregnancy (n = 44), the incidence of abnormal results was 10%. All but one patient with abnormal CC-t were poor responders during the first stimulation cycle. The flare-up protocol did not improve the ovarian response in these patients.

Lingua originaleInglese
pagine (da-a)321-326
Numero di pagine6
RivistaGynecological Endocrinology
Volume11
Numero di pubblicazione5
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 1997
Pubblicato esternamente

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Comparison of a blocking vs. a flare-up protocol in poor responders with a normal and abnormal clomiphene citrate challenge test'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo