TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Features, Cardiovascular Risk Profile, and Therapeutic Trajectories of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Candidate for Oral Semaglutide Therapy in the Italian Specialist Care
AU - for the PIONEERING EXPERIENCE study group
AU - Morieri, Mario Luca
AU - Candido, Riccardo
AU - Frontoni, Simona
AU - Disoteo, Olga
AU - Solini, Anna
AU - Fadini, Gian Paolo
AU - Bellanti, Francesco
AU - Caprio, Massimiliano
AU - Cutolo, Michele
AU - Formoso, Gloria
AU - Forte, Elisa
AU - Frison, Vera
AU - Gregori, Giovanna
AU - Lencioni, Cristina
AU - Leto, Gaetano
AU - Mandica, Salvatore
AU - Marangoni, Alberto
AU - Memoli, Pasqualina
AU - Memoli, Giuseppe
AU - Negri, Carlo
AU - Nollino, Laura
AU - Perrelli, Andrea
AU - Perrini, Sebastio
AU - Prodam, Flavia
AU - Rebora, Alberto
AU - Sansone, Daniela
AU - Sciaraffia, Marcello
AU - Settembrini, Silvio
AU - Sodo, Gaetano
AU - Tassone, Francesco
AU - Todisco, Valentina
AU - Vetrano, Antonio
AU - Accardo, Giacomo
AU - Albanese, Valeria
AU - Alemanno, Irene
AU - Allasia, Stefano
AU - Alosa, Rosario
AU - Altomari, Anna
AU - Amato, Anna Maria Letizia
AU - Ambrosetti, Eleonora
AU - Angarano, Angela
AU - Angotti, Stefania
AU - Anichini, Roberto
AU - Baccetti, Fabio
AU - Balbo, Marcella
AU - Balestra, Elisabetta
AU - Balzano, Sara
AU - Barone, Maria
AU - Baronti, Walter
AU - Caputo, Marina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Introduction: This study aimed to address therapeutic inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by investigating the potential of early treatment with oral semaglutide. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2021 and April 2022 among specialists treating individuals with T2D. A scientific committee designed a data collection form covering demographics, cardiovascular risk, glucose control metrics, ongoing therapies, and physician judgments on treatment appropriateness. Participants completed anonymous patient questionnaires reflecting routine clinical encounters. The preferred therapeutic regimen for each patient was also identified. Results: The analysis was conducted on 4449 patients initiating oral semaglutide. The population had a relatively short disease duration (42% < 5 years), and a minority (15.6%) had a history of cardiovascular events. Importantly, oral semaglutide was started in subjects with various disease durations and background therapies. Notably, its initiation was accompanied by de-prescription of sulfonylureas, pioglitazone, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulin. Choice of oral semaglutide was influenced by patient profiles and ongoing glucose-lowering regimens. Factors such as younger age, higher HbA1c, and ongoing SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy drove the choice of oral semaglutide with the aim of improving glycemic control. Projected glycemic effectiveness analysis revealed that oral semaglutide could potentially lead HbA1c to target in > 60% of patients, and more often than sitagliptin or empagliflozin. Conclusion: The study supports the potential of early implementation of oral semaglutide as a strategy to overcome therapeutic inertia and enhance T2D management.
AB - Introduction: This study aimed to address therapeutic inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by investigating the potential of early treatment with oral semaglutide. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2021 and April 2022 among specialists treating individuals with T2D. A scientific committee designed a data collection form covering demographics, cardiovascular risk, glucose control metrics, ongoing therapies, and physician judgments on treatment appropriateness. Participants completed anonymous patient questionnaires reflecting routine clinical encounters. The preferred therapeutic regimen for each patient was also identified. Results: The analysis was conducted on 4449 patients initiating oral semaglutide. The population had a relatively short disease duration (42% < 5 years), and a minority (15.6%) had a history of cardiovascular events. Importantly, oral semaglutide was started in subjects with various disease durations and background therapies. Notably, its initiation was accompanied by de-prescription of sulfonylureas, pioglitazone, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulin. Choice of oral semaglutide was influenced by patient profiles and ongoing glucose-lowering regimens. Factors such as younger age, higher HbA1c, and ongoing SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy drove the choice of oral semaglutide with the aim of improving glycemic control. Projected glycemic effectiveness analysis revealed that oral semaglutide could potentially lead HbA1c to target in > 60% of patients, and more often than sitagliptin or empagliflozin. Conclusion: The study supports the potential of early implementation of oral semaglutide as a strategy to overcome therapeutic inertia and enhance T2D management.
KW - Cardiovascular risk
KW - GLP-1
KW - Management
KW - Survey
KW - Therapeutic inertia
KW - Type 2 diabetes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85174565246
U2 - 10.1007/s13300-023-01490-6
DO - 10.1007/s13300-023-01490-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1869-6953
VL - 14
SP - 2159
EP - 2172
JO - Diabetes Therapy
JF - Diabetes Therapy
IS - 12
ER -