TY - JOUR
T1 - Cittadini, partiti ed esperti: una relazione complicata
AU - BIALE, ENRICO
AU - Bistagnino, G
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The role of experts within contemporary democracies has become one the most politicised and pressing topics of our time. On one hand, democratic governments need expert advice for effective governance, leading towards forms of technocratic politics; on the other, the spread of populist movements has undermined popular trust in experts. Since these phenomena are troublesome for a democratic polity, we propose a new understanding of the division of labour between experts and citizens. Drawing from a deliberative perspective, we contend that intermediaries between citizens and experts are in order, and political parties, if properly constrained, can provide this function. We claim that if intra-party deliberation between managing party members and experts is granted, then citizens have control over the proposals of experts without needing to directly engage with them. Our perspective recognises the epistemic superiority of experts, unlike populism, but ensures, unlike technocracy, that only citizens can authorise policies.
AB - The role of experts within contemporary democracies has become one the most politicised and pressing topics of our time. On one hand, democratic governments need expert advice for effective governance, leading towards forms of technocratic politics; on the other, the spread of populist movements has undermined popular trust in experts. Since these phenomena are troublesome for a democratic polity, we propose a new understanding of the division of labour between experts and citizens. Drawing from a deliberative perspective, we contend that intermediaries between citizens and experts are in order, and political parties, if properly constrained, can provide this function. We claim that if intra-party deliberation between managing party members and experts is granted, then citizens have control over the proposals of experts without needing to directly engage with them. Our perspective recognises the epistemic superiority of experts, unlike populism, but ensures, unlike technocracy, that only citizens can authorise policies.
KW - deliberative democracy
KW - expertise
KW - intra-party deliberation
KW - normative political theory
KW - normative theories of political parties
KW - deliberative democracy
KW - expertise
KW - intra-party deliberation
KW - normative political theory
KW - normative theories of political parties
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/126070
U2 - 10.48271/100458
DO - 10.48271/100458
M3 - Article
SN - 1124-7959
SP - 89
EP - 113
JO - QUADERNI DI SCIENZA POLITICA
JF - QUADERNI DI SCIENZA POLITICA
ER -