TY - JOUR
T1 - Carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed, high-risk myeloma patients not eligible for transplant
T2 - A pooled analysis of two studies
AU - Mina, Roberto
AU - Bonello, Francesca
AU - Petrucci, Maria Teresa
AU - Liberati, Anna Marina
AU - Conticello, Concetta
AU - Ballanti, Stelvio
AU - Musto, Pellegrino
AU - Olivieri, Attilio
AU - Benevolo, Giulia
AU - Capra, Andrea
AU - Gilestro, Milena
AU - Galieni, Piero
AU - Cavo, Michele
AU - Siniscalchi, Agostina
AU - Palumbo, Antonio
AU - Montefusco, Vittorio
AU - Gaidano, Gianluca
AU - Omedé, Paola
AU - Boccadoro, Mario
AU - Bringhen, Sara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Ferrata Storti Foundation
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Despite remarkable advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decades, the prognosis of patients harboring high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities remains dismal as compared to that of standard-risk patients. Proteasome inhibitors have been demonstrated to partially ameliorate the prognosis of high-risk patients. We pooled together data from two phase I/II trials on transplant-ineligible patients with MM receiving upfront carfilzomib cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by carfilzomib maintenance. The aim of this analysis was to compare treatment outcomes in patients with standard-risk versus high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. High risk was defined by the presence of at least one chromosomal abnormality, including t(4;14), del17p and t(14;16). Overall, 94 patients were included in the analysis: 57 (61%) in the standard-risk and 37 (39%) in the high-risk group. Median follow-up was 38 months. In standard-risk versus high-risk patients, we observed similar progression-free survival (PFS) (3-year PFS: 52% vs. 43%, respectively; P=0.50), overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 78% vs. 73%; P=0.38), and overall response rate (88% vs. 95%; P=0.47), with no statistical differences between the two groups. No difference in terms of PFS was observed between patients with or without del17p. Carfilzomib, used both as induction and maintenance agent for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM patients, mitigated the poor prognosis carried by high-risk cytogenetics and resulted in similar PFS and OS as in standard-risk patients.
AB - Despite remarkable advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decades, the prognosis of patients harboring high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities remains dismal as compared to that of standard-risk patients. Proteasome inhibitors have been demonstrated to partially ameliorate the prognosis of high-risk patients. We pooled together data from two phase I/II trials on transplant-ineligible patients with MM receiving upfront carfilzomib cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by carfilzomib maintenance. The aim of this analysis was to compare treatment outcomes in patients with standard-risk versus high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. High risk was defined by the presence of at least one chromosomal abnormality, including t(4;14), del17p and t(14;16). Overall, 94 patients were included in the analysis: 57 (61%) in the standard-risk and 37 (39%) in the high-risk group. Median follow-up was 38 months. In standard-risk versus high-risk patients, we observed similar progression-free survival (PFS) (3-year PFS: 52% vs. 43%, respectively; P=0.50), overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 78% vs. 73%; P=0.38), and overall response rate (88% vs. 95%; P=0.47), with no statistical differences between the two groups. No difference in terms of PFS was observed between patients with or without del17p. Carfilzomib, used both as induction and maintenance agent for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed MM patients, mitigated the poor prognosis carried by high-risk cytogenetics and resulted in similar PFS and OS as in standard-risk patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090482673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2019.243428
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2019.243428
M3 - Article
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 106
SP - 1079
EP - 1085
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 4
ER -