Cardiac implantable electronic devices with a defibrillator component and all-cause mortality in left ventricular assist device carriers: results from the PCHF-VAD registry

Maja Cikes, Nina Jakus, Brian Claggett, Jasper J Brugts, Philippe Timmermans, Anne-Catherine Pouleur, Pawel Rubis, Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck, Edvinas Gaizauskas, Sebastian Grundmann, Stefania Paolillo, Eduardo Barge-Caballero, DOMENICO D'AMARIO, Aggeliki Gkouziouta, Ivo Planinc, Jesse F Veenis, Luc-Marie Jacquet, Laura Houard, Katarzyna Holcman, Arno GigaseFilip Rega, Kestutis Rucinskas, Stamatios Adamopoulos, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Bojan Biocina, Hrvoje Gasparovic, Lars H Lund, Andreas J Flammer, Marco Metra, Davor Milicic, Frank Ruschitzka

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

Aims To compare characteristics of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with a defibrillator component (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation, CIED-D) vs. those without one, and to assess whether carrying such a device contiguously with an LVAD is associated with outcomes.Methods and results Overall, 448 patients were analysed (mean age 52 +/- 13 years, 82% male) in the multicentre European PCHF-VAD registry. To account for all active CIED-Ds during ongoing LVAD treatment, outcome analyses were performed by a time-varying analysis with active CIED-D status post-LVAD as the time-varying covariate. At the time of LVAD implantation, 235 patients (52%) had an active CIED-D. Median time on LVAD support was 1.1 years (interquartile range 0.5-2.0 years). A reduction of 36% in the risk of all-cause mortality was observed in patients with an active CIED-D [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.91; P = 0.012), increasing to 41% after adjustment for baseline covariates (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87; P = 0.008) and 39% after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94; P = 0.027). Other than CIED-D, age, LVAD implant as redo surgery, number of ventricular arrhythmia episodes and use of vasopressors pre-LVAD were remaining significant risk factors of all-cause mortality. Incident ventricular arrhythmias post-LVAD portended a 2.4-fold and 2.6-fold increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, respectively; carrying an active CIED-D remained associated with a 47% and 43% reduction in these events, respectively.Conclusions In an analysis accounting for all active CIED-Ds, including those implanted during LVAD support, carrying such a device was associated with significantly better survival during LVAD support.
Lingua originaleInglese
RivistaEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume21
Numero di pubblicazione9
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - 2019

Keywords

  • Advanced heart failure
  • Cardiac implantable electronic device
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
  • Left ventricular assist devices
  • Mortality
  • Ventricular arrhythmia

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'Cardiac implantable electronic devices with a defibrillator component and all-cause mortality in left ventricular assist device carriers: results from the PCHF-VAD registry'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo