BoNT-A for Post-Stroke Spasticity: Guidance on Unmet Clinical Needs from a Delphi Panel Approach

Alessio Baricich, Theodore Wein, Nicoletta Cinone, Michele Bertoni, Alessandro Picelli, Carmelo Chisari, Franco Molteni, Andrea Santamato

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivistaArticolo in rivistapeer review

Abstract

There is extensive literature supporting the efficacy of botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) for the treatment of post-stroke spasticity, however, there remain gaps in the routine management of patients with post-stroke spasticity. A panel of 21 Italian experts was selected to participate in this web-based survey Delphi process to provide guidance that can support clinicians in the decision-making process. There was a broad consensus among physicians that BoNT-A intervention should be administered as soon as the spasticity interferes with the patients’ clinical condition. Patients monitoring is needed over time, a follow-up of 4–6 weeks is considered necessary. Furthermore, physicians agreed that treatment should be offered irrespective of the duration of the spasticity. The Delphi consensus also stressed the importance of patient-centered goals in order to satisfy the clinical needs of the patient regardless of time of onset or duration of spasticity. The findings arising from this Delphi process provide insights into the unmet needs in managing post-stroke spasticity from the clinician’s perspective and provides guidance for physicians for the utilization of BoNT-A for the treatment of post-stroke spasticity in daily practice.

Lingua originaleInglese
Numero di articolo236
RivistaToxins
Volume13
Numero di pubblicazione4
DOI
Stato di pubblicazionePubblicato - apr 2021

Fingerprint

Entra nei temi di ricerca di 'BoNT-A for Post-Stroke Spasticity: Guidance on Unmet Clinical Needs from a Delphi Panel Approach'. Insieme formano una fingerprint unica.

Cita questo