TY - JOUR
T1 - Better hospital context increases success of care pathway implementation on achieving greater teamwork
T2 - A multicenter study on STEMI care
AU - Aeyels, Daan
AU - Bruyneel, Luk
AU - Seys, Deborah
AU - Sinnaeve, Peter R.
AU - Sermeus, Walter
AU - Panella, Massimiliano
AU - Vanhaecht, Kris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate whether hospital context influences the effect of care pathway implementation on teamwork processes and output in STEMI care. Design: A multicenter pre-post intervention study. Setting: Eleven acute hospitals. Participants: Cardiologists-in-chief, nurse managers, quality staff, quality managers and program managers reported on hospital context. Teamwork was rated by professional groups (medical doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, other) in the following departments: emergency room, catheterization lab, coronary care unit, cardiology ward and rehabilitation. Intervention: Care pathway covering in-hospital care from emergency services to rehabilitation. Main outcome measures: Hospital context was measured by the five dimensions of the Model for Understanding Success in Quality: microsystem, quality improvement team, quality improvement support, high-level organization, external environment. Teamwork process measures reflected teamwork between professional groups within departments and teamwork between departments. Teamwork output was measured through the level of organized care. Two-level regression analysis accounted for clustering of respondents within hospitals and assessed the influence of hospital context on the impact of care pathway implementation on teamwork. Results: Care pathway implementation significantly improved teamwork processes both between professional groups (P < 0.001) and between departments (P < 0.001). Teamwork output also improved (P < 0.001). The effect of care pathway implementation on teamwork was more pronounced when the quality improvement team and quality improvement support and capacity were more positively reported on. Conclusions: Hospitals can leverage the effect of quality improvement interventions such as care pathways by evaluating and improving aspects of hospital context.
AB - Objective: To evaluate whether hospital context influences the effect of care pathway implementation on teamwork processes and output in STEMI care. Design: A multicenter pre-post intervention study. Setting: Eleven acute hospitals. Participants: Cardiologists-in-chief, nurse managers, quality staff, quality managers and program managers reported on hospital context. Teamwork was rated by professional groups (medical doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, other) in the following departments: emergency room, catheterization lab, coronary care unit, cardiology ward and rehabilitation. Intervention: Care pathway covering in-hospital care from emergency services to rehabilitation. Main outcome measures: Hospital context was measured by the five dimensions of the Model for Understanding Success in Quality: microsystem, quality improvement team, quality improvement support, high-level organization, external environment. Teamwork process measures reflected teamwork between professional groups within departments and teamwork between departments. Teamwork output was measured through the level of organized care. Two-level regression analysis accounted for clustering of respondents within hospitals and assessed the influence of hospital context on the impact of care pathway implementation on teamwork. Results: Care pathway implementation significantly improved teamwork processes both between professional groups (P < 0.001) and between departments (P < 0.001). Teamwork output also improved (P < 0.001). The effect of care pathway implementation on teamwork was more pronounced when the quality improvement team and quality improvement support and capacity were more positively reported on. Conclusions: Hospitals can leverage the effect of quality improvement interventions such as care pathways by evaluating and improving aspects of hospital context.
KW - acute coronary syndrome
KW - critical pathways
KW - hospital administration
KW - patient care team
KW - quality improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073984023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzy197
DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzy197
M3 - Article
SN - 1353-4505
VL - 31
SP - 442
EP - 448
JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
IS - 6
ER -