TY - GEN
T1 - Best practices in European restructuring contractualised distress resolution in the shadow of the law.
Italian National Findings
Italian National Report
AU - RIVA, PATRIZIA
AU - Balmer, Nigel J.
AU - Burigo, Francesca
AU - Danovi, Alessandro
AU - Darr, Amber
AU - D’Angelo, Francesco
AU - Donati, Iacopo
AU - Flores, Marta
AU - Forestieri, Ilaria
AU - Ganigian, Clarisa L.
AU - Giacomelli, Silvia
AU - Lenzi, Diletta
AU - Lucarelli, Paola
AU - Marcucci, Monica
AU - Martinez, Cristiano
AU - Nocilla, Alfonso S.
AU - Orlando, Tommaso
AU - Rodano, Giacomo
AU - Zenker, Wolfgang
AU - Zorzi, Andrea
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - The general trend away from traditional, formal insolvency proceedings opens up a vast
area to private ordering, with all the associated opportunities and risks.
The transition can be less costly if the resulting uncertainty is reduced to a minimum.
This presents national legislators with a delicate challenge. They should not be overly
prescriptive and should effectively delegate decision-making to stakeholders and expert
professionals, who are likely to be better informed and better incentivised. At the same
time, the law must provide for information to fow where needed and for the creation of
optimal incentives.
Against this background, guidance on best practices can be of great value. It may assist
policymaking in one jurisdiction by drawing attention to successes and failures in others,
and it may allow professionals, advisors, debtors, creditors and courts to fnd common
ground in the formulation of high-quality distress resolution plans and in distinguishing
viable and non-viable distressed debtors.
Based on extensive empirical research in four European Union states, this book takes
up the challenge of unearthing and crystallising some of the most critical best practices
in the various stages of a distress resolution process. Drawing on these best practices, it
provides lawmakers with several ‘Policy Recommendations’, and other key stakeholders
with a set of ‘Guidelines’. Special attention is given to the particular needs of micro,
small and medium enterprises.
AB - The general trend away from traditional, formal insolvency proceedings opens up a vast
area to private ordering, with all the associated opportunities and risks.
The transition can be less costly if the resulting uncertainty is reduced to a minimum.
This presents national legislators with a delicate challenge. They should not be overly
prescriptive and should effectively delegate decision-making to stakeholders and expert
professionals, who are likely to be better informed and better incentivised. At the same
time, the law must provide for information to fow where needed and for the creation of
optimal incentives.
Against this background, guidance on best practices can be of great value. It may assist
policymaking in one jurisdiction by drawing attention to successes and failures in others,
and it may allow professionals, advisors, debtors, creditors and courts to fnd common
ground in the formulation of high-quality distress resolution plans and in distinguishing
viable and non-viable distressed debtors.
Based on extensive empirical research in four European Union states, this book takes
up the challenge of unearthing and crystallising some of the most critical best practices
in the various stages of a distress resolution process. Drawing on these best practices, it
provides lawmakers with several ‘Policy Recommendations’, and other key stakeholders
with a set of ‘Guidelines’. Special attention is given to the particular needs of micro,
small and medium enterprises.
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/102992
M3 - Other contribution
SN - 9788813370961
ER -