Abstract
Abstract
The paper questions the view that the alleged lack of autonomy displayed by certain
practices and cultural behavior may constitute a sound justification for limiting
toleration of those practices. Not only is the concept of autonomy open to endless
controversy, but it also entails a conflict with liberal public morality and often nurtures
double standards. To this end, the paper first examines the assumptions and basis of the
lack-of-autonomy approach; this analysis perforce leads the author to unravel the
notion of autonomy and its rival conceptions. Second, it will be argued that liberal
and democratic politics, though indebted to the value of personal autonomy in a fashion,
requires only a purely political principle of autonomy. It is also contended that if comprehensive
notions of autonomy are used instead of a purely political conception,
unacceptable consequences for the public morality of liberal democracy may follow.
Finally, the point will be illustrated with some examples drawn from multicultural
politics.
Lingua originale | Inglese |
---|---|
Numero di pagine | 21 |
Rivista | European Journal of Political Theory |
DOI | |
Stato di pubblicazione | Pubblicato - 1 gen 2014 |
Keywords
- Toleration
- autonomy
- cultural practices
- harm principle
- political liberalism