TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support
T2 - a Focused Literature Survey
AU - Montani, Stefania
AU - Striani, Manuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IMIA and Georg Thieme Verlag KG.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objectives: This survey analyses the latest literature contributions to clinical decision support systems (DSSs) on a two-year period (2017-2018), focusing on the approaches that adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in a broad sense. The goal is to analyse the distribution of data-driven AI approaches with respect to “classical” knowledge-based ones, and to consider the issues raised and their possible solutions. Methods: We included PubMed and Web of ScienceTM publications, focusing on contributions describing clinical DSSs that adopted one or more AI methodologies. Results: We selected 75 papers, 49 of which describe approaches in the data-driven AI area, 20 present purely knowledge-based DSSs, and 6 adopt hybrid approaches relying on both formalized knowledge and data. Conclusions: Recent studies in the clinical DSS area demonstrate a prevalence of data-driven AI, which can be adopted autonomously in purely data-driven systems, or in cooperation with domain knowledge in hybrid systems. Such hybrid approaches, able to conjugate all available knowledge sources through proper knowledge integration steps, represent an interesting example of synergy between the two AI categories. This synergy can lead to the resolution of some existing issues, such as the need for transparency and explainability, nowadays recognized as central themes to be addressed by both AI and medical informatics research.
AB - Objectives: This survey analyses the latest literature contributions to clinical decision support systems (DSSs) on a two-year period (2017-2018), focusing on the approaches that adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques in a broad sense. The goal is to analyse the distribution of data-driven AI approaches with respect to “classical” knowledge-based ones, and to consider the issues raised and their possible solutions. Methods: We included PubMed and Web of ScienceTM publications, focusing on contributions describing clinical DSSs that adopted one or more AI methodologies. Results: We selected 75 papers, 49 of which describe approaches in the data-driven AI area, 20 present purely knowledge-based DSSs, and 6 adopt hybrid approaches relying on both formalized knowledge and data. Conclusions: Recent studies in the clinical DSS area demonstrate a prevalence of data-driven AI, which can be adopted autonomously in purely data-driven systems, or in cooperation with domain knowledge in hybrid systems. Such hybrid approaches, able to conjugate all available knowledge sources through proper knowledge integration steps, represent an interesting example of synergy between the two AI categories. This synergy can lead to the resolution of some existing issues, such as the need for transparency and explainability, nowadays recognized as central themes to be addressed by both AI and medical informatics research.
KW - Clinical; Artificial Intelligence
KW - Decision Support System
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071965331&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0039-1677911
DO - 10.1055/s-0039-1677911
M3 - Article
C2 - 31419824
AN - SCOPUS:85071965331
SN - 0943-4747
VL - 28
SP - 120
EP - 127
JO - Yearbook of medical informatics
JF - Yearbook of medical informatics
IS - 1
ER -