TY - JOUR
T1 - Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part II
AU - Galli, Mattia
AU - Gragnano, Felice
AU - Berteotti, Martina
AU - Marcucci, Rossella
AU - Gargiulo, Giuseppe
AU - Calabrò, Paolo
AU - Terracciano, Fabrizia
AU - Andreotti, Felicita
AU - Patti, Giuseppe Rocco Salvatore
AU - De Caterina, Raffaele
AU - Capodanno, Davide
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Perrone Filardi, Pasquale
AU - Cirillo, Plinio
AU - Angiolillo, Dominick J.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.
AB - Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.
KW - anticoagulant
KW - antiplatelet
KW - antithrombotic therapy
KW - bleeding
KW - high bleeding risk
KW - percutaneous interventions
KW - anticoagulant
KW - antiplatelet
KW - antithrombotic therapy
KW - bleeding
KW - high bleeding risk
KW - percutaneous interventions
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/200087
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.011
M3 - Article
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 17
SP - 2325
EP - 2336
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 20
ER -