TY - JOUR
T1 - Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part I
T2 - Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions
AU - Working Group of Thrombosis of the Italian Society of Cardiology
AU - Galli, Mattia
AU - Gragnano, Felice
AU - Berteotti, Martina
AU - Marcucci, Rossella
AU - Gargiulo, Giuseppe
AU - Calabrò, Paolo
AU - Terracciano, Fabrizia
AU - Andreotti, Felicita
AU - Patti, Giuseppe
AU - De Caterina, Raffaele
AU - Capodanno, Davide
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - Mehran, Roxana
AU - Perrone Filardi, Pasquale
AU - Cirillo, Plinio
AU - Angiolillo, Dominick J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10/14
Y1 - 2024/10/14
N2 - Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions.
AB - Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions.
KW - anticoagulants therapy
KW - antiplatelet therapy
KW - antithrombotic therapy
KW - cardiac interventions
KW - high bleeding risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205908604&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.022
M3 - Review article
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 17
SP - 2197
EP - 2215
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 19
ER -