TY - JOUR
T1 - Air leak and intraoperative bleeding in thoracic surgery
T2 - a Delphi consensus among the members of Italian society of thoracic surgery
AU - Cardillo, Giuseppe
AU - Nosotti, Mario
AU - Scarci, Marco
AU - Torre, Massimo
AU - Alloisio, Marco
AU - Benvenuti, Mauro Roberto
AU - Bertani, Alessandro
AU - Cagini, Lucio
AU - Casablanca, Giuseppe
AU - Cavallesco, Giorgio
AU - Cherchi, Roberto
AU - Crucitti, Pierfilippo
AU - Curcio, Carlo
AU - Denegri, Andrea
AU - Droghetti, Andrea
AU - Guggino, Gianluca
AU - Imperatori, Andrea
AU - Infante, Maurizio Valentino
AU - Lucchi, Marco
AU - Macrì, Paolo
AU - Marulli, Giuseppe
AU - Melloni, Giulio
AU - Paci, Massimiliano
AU - Paladini, Piero
AU - Pariscenti, Gian Luca
AU - Potenza, Enrico
AU - Rea, Federico
AU - Refai, Majed
AU - Rena, Ottavio
AU - Ricciardi, Sara
AU - Rusca, Michele
AU - Sollitto, Francesco
AU - Taurchini, Marco
AU - Terzi, Alberto
AU - Voltolini, Luca
AU - Crisci, Roberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Persistent air leak and the management of intraoperative blood loss are common threats in thoracic surgical practice. The availability of new procedures, technology and materials is constantly evolving topical hemostats and surgical sealants must be added to this toolkit. Topical hemostats and surgical sealants differ according to their chemical nature and physical characteristics, to their origin and mechanism of action, regulatory/registration and vigilance paths. A Delphi consensus was set to highlight the different points of view on the use of topical haemostatic products and sealants among the members of Italian Society of thoracic surgery. Methods: The board was formed by a group of five Italian experts; in the first phase after a careful review of the scientific literature and two rounds, the board finally generated 16 consensus statements for testing across a wider audience. During the second phase, the statements were collated into a questionnaire, which was electronically sent to a panel of 46 Italian surgeons, experts in the field. Results: Out of 46 Italian surgeons, 33 (72%) panel members responded to the Delphi questionnaire. All the items reached a positive consensus, with elevated levels of agreement, as demonstrated by the presence of a 100% consensus for nine items. For the remaining 7 statements the minimum level of consent was 88% (29 participants approved the statement and 4 disagreed) and the maximum was 97% (32 participants approved the statement and 1 was in disagreement). Conclusions: The present Delphi analysis shows that air leak and intraoperative bleeding are clinical problems well known among thoracic surgeons. Nevertheless, the aim of the scientific societies and of the group of experts is to execute the education activities in the surgery community. This Delphi survey suggest the need of wider and updated scientific information about technical and registration characteristics of most recent technologic solutions, such as the of topical hemostats and surgical sealants to provide healthcare and administrative staff with the opportunity to work and interact through a common and shared language and eventually to guarantee minimal requirements of assistance.
AB - Background: Persistent air leak and the management of intraoperative blood loss are common threats in thoracic surgical practice. The availability of new procedures, technology and materials is constantly evolving topical hemostats and surgical sealants must be added to this toolkit. Topical hemostats and surgical sealants differ according to their chemical nature and physical characteristics, to their origin and mechanism of action, regulatory/registration and vigilance paths. A Delphi consensus was set to highlight the different points of view on the use of topical haemostatic products and sealants among the members of Italian Society of thoracic surgery. Methods: The board was formed by a group of five Italian experts; in the first phase after a careful review of the scientific literature and two rounds, the board finally generated 16 consensus statements for testing across a wider audience. During the second phase, the statements were collated into a questionnaire, which was electronically sent to a panel of 46 Italian surgeons, experts in the field. Results: Out of 46 Italian surgeons, 33 (72%) panel members responded to the Delphi questionnaire. All the items reached a positive consensus, with elevated levels of agreement, as demonstrated by the presence of a 100% consensus for nine items. For the remaining 7 statements the minimum level of consent was 88% (29 participants approved the statement and 4 disagreed) and the maximum was 97% (32 participants approved the statement and 1 was in disagreement). Conclusions: The present Delphi analysis shows that air leak and intraoperative bleeding are clinical problems well known among thoracic surgeons. Nevertheless, the aim of the scientific societies and of the group of experts is to execute the education activities in the surgery community. This Delphi survey suggest the need of wider and updated scientific information about technical and registration characteristics of most recent technologic solutions, such as the of topical hemostats and surgical sealants to provide healthcare and administrative staff with the opportunity to work and interact through a common and shared language and eventually to guarantee minimal requirements of assistance.
KW - Delphi technique
KW - air leak
KW - bleeding
KW - thoracic surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142853804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21037/jtd-22-619
DO - 10.21037/jtd-22-619
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-1439
VL - 14
SP - 3842
EP - 3853
JO - Journal of Thoracic Disease
JF - Journal of Thoracic Disease
IS - 10
ER -