TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of ADC ratio in discriminating true and false positives in multiparametric prostatic MRI
AU - Falaschi, Zeno
AU - Valenti, Martina
AU - Lanzo, Giuseppe
AU - Attanasio, Silvia
AU - Valentini, Eleonora
AU - García Navarro, Lara Isabel
AU - Aquilini, Ferruccio
AU - Stecco, Alessandro
AU - Carriero, Alessandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Purpose: Our goal was to evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios in discriminating true from false positives in multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 98 prostate lesions in a series of 73 patients who had undergone prostate mpMRI and standard 12-core prostatic biopsy in our institution from 2016 to 2018. Two experienced radiologists performed double blind ADC value quantifications of both MRI-identified lesions and apparently benign contralateral prostatic parenchyma in a circular region of interest (ROI) of ∼10 mm2. The ratios between the mean values of both measurements (i.e., ADC ratio mean) and between the minimum value of the lesion and the maximum value of the benign parenchyma (i.e., ADC ratio min-max) were automatically calculated. The malignancy of all lesions was determined through biopsy according to Gleason score (GS ≥ 6) and localization. Results: For Reader 1, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ADC ratio mean and ADC ratio min-max were 0.72 and 0.67, respectively, whereas for Reader 2 these values were 0.74 and 0.71, respectively. The best cut-off values for ADC ratio means were ≥ 0.5 (Reader 1) and ≥ 0.6 (Reader 2), with a sensitivity of 76.3 % and 84.2 % and a specificity of 51.7 % and 50 %, respectively. Moreover, based on a threshold of 0.6, no clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was missed by Reader 1, while only one went unnoticed by Reader 2. Conclusion: The ADC ratio is a useful and moderately accurate complementary tool to diagnose prostate cancer in the mp-MRI.
AB - Purpose: Our goal was to evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios in discriminating true from false positives in multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 98 prostate lesions in a series of 73 patients who had undergone prostate mpMRI and standard 12-core prostatic biopsy in our institution from 2016 to 2018. Two experienced radiologists performed double blind ADC value quantifications of both MRI-identified lesions and apparently benign contralateral prostatic parenchyma in a circular region of interest (ROI) of ∼10 mm2. The ratios between the mean values of both measurements (i.e., ADC ratio mean) and between the minimum value of the lesion and the maximum value of the benign parenchyma (i.e., ADC ratio min-max) were automatically calculated. The malignancy of all lesions was determined through biopsy according to Gleason score (GS ≥ 6) and localization. Results: For Reader 1, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ADC ratio mean and ADC ratio min-max were 0.72 and 0.67, respectively, whereas for Reader 2 these values were 0.74 and 0.71, respectively. The best cut-off values for ADC ratio means were ≥ 0.5 (Reader 1) and ≥ 0.6 (Reader 2), with a sensitivity of 76.3 % and 84.2 % and a specificity of 51.7 % and 50 %, respectively. Moreover, based on a threshold of 0.6, no clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was missed by Reader 1, while only one went unnoticed by Reader 2. Conclusion: The ADC ratio is a useful and moderately accurate complementary tool to diagnose prostate cancer in the mp-MRI.
KW - ADC ratio
KW - Diffusion-weighted imaging
KW - Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Prostate cancer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084229997
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109024
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109024
M3 - Article
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 128
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 109024
ER -