A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

Luigi Battezzato

doi:10.1093/cq/49.2.647

A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

Luigi Battezzato

Risultato della ricerca: Contributo su rivista › Articolo in rivista › peer review

Abstract

The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.

Lingua originale	Inglese
pagine (da-a)	647-648
Numero di pagine	2
Rivista	Classical Quarterly
Volume	49
Numero di pubblicazione	2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/49.2.647
Stato di pubblicazione	Pubblicato - dic 1999
Pubblicato esternamente	Sì

Accesso al documento

10.1093/cq/49.2.647

Altri file e collegamenti

Link to publication in Scopus

Cita questo

@article{553062075de746a69affadd66226c3d7,

title = "A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70",

abstract = "The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.",

author = "Luigi Battezzato",

year = "1999",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1093/cq/49.2.647",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "647--648",

journal = "Classical Quarterly",

issn = "0009-8388",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

AU - Battezzato, Luigi

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.

AB - The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85007989612

U2 - 10.1093/cq/49.2.647

DO - 10.1093/cq/49.2.647

M3 - Article

SN - 0009-8388

VL - 49

SP - 647

EP - 648

JO - Classical Quarterly

JF - Classical Quarterly

IS - 2

ER -

A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

Abstract

Accesso al documento

Altri file e collegamenti

Fingerprint

Cita questo