Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

White blood cell DNA adducts, smoking, and NAT2 and GSTM1 genotypes in bladder cancer: A case-control study

  • Marco Peluso
  • , Luisa Airoldi
  • , Munnia Armelle
  • , Tiziana Martone
  • , Renato Coda
  • , Christian Malaveille
  • , Giuseppe Giacomelli
  • , Carlo Terrone
  • , Giovanni Casetta
  • , Paolo Vineis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We conducted a case-control study on 114 bladder cancer patients and 46 hospital controls. DNA adducts were measured in WBCs by 32P postlabeling and showed no association with smoking habits and the glutathione-S- transferase M1 genotype. A strong association between adduct levels and the N-acetyltransferase (NAT2) genotype was found (P = 0.0002). The NAT2 genotype was associated in a nonstatistically significant way to the case-control status (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.2). In a logistic regression model, the log of DNA adduct levels was associated in a highly significant way to the risk of bladder cancer (regression coefficient, 0.75; P = 0.0006), independently of smoking habits. Using the median of DNA adducts (RAL, 0.3) as a cutoff point, the odds ratio for the risk of bladder cancer was 4.1 (age-adjusted; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-9.0). Our study suggests that sources other than tobacco smoke contribute to the formation of aromatic DNA adducts in WBCs. The role of WBC-DNA adducts in predicting bladder cancer is still to be clarified.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-346
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume7
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1998
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'White blood cell DNA adducts, smoking, and NAT2 and GSTM1 genotypes in bladder cancer: A case-control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this