Abstract
In this paper we focus on transmission and failure of transmission of warrant. We identify three individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for transmission of warrant, and we show that their satisfaction grounds a number of interesting epistemic phenomena that have not been sufficiently appreciated in the literature. We then scrutinise Wright's analysis of transmission failure and improve on extant readings of it. Nonetheless, we present a Bayesian counterexample that shows that Wright's analysis is partially incoherent with our analysis of warrant transmission and prima facie defective. We conclude exploring three alternative lines of reply: developing a more satisfactory account of transmission failure, which we outline; dismissing the Bayesian counterexample by rejecting some of its assumptions; reinterpreting Wright's analysis to make it immune to the counterexample.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2481-2503 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Synthese |
| Volume | 190 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Crispin Wright
- Epistemic transmission
- Propositional warrant
- Transmission failure
- Transmission of warrant
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When warrant transmits and when it doesn't: Towards a general framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver