Abstract
In metropolitan areas collective transport is often supplied by many firms and in many modes. The paper focusses on the merging of decisions about prices in two market regimes: monopoly and benevolent regulation through Ramsey pricing. The results confirm that centralization entails efficiency gains under monopoly whenever a unique supplier substitutes many firms serving each link of a network. Under benevolent regulation, instead, centralization entails efficiency gains only under certain conditions. Moreover, efficiency improvements under Ramsey pricing involve the introduction of cross subsidies among previous regulatory jurisdictions. Hence some users gain while others lose. Both the theoretical and empirical literature suggest that periphery residents are the main beneficiaries of centralization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 257-274 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Welfare Effects of Price Integration in Local Public Transport'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver