Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

US growth and budget consolidation in the 1990s: Was there a non-Keynesian effect?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The 1990s were an extraordinary period for the US economy, both because of declining budget deficits and emerging budget surpluses, as well as high rates of economic growth. This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that high growth rates caused budget improvements, and claims that budget consolidations also contributed to fostering economic growth. We propose the existence of a non-Keynesian effect, where fiscal policy runs counter to Keynesian theory and fiscal consolidation can foster economic growth. We present empirical evidence that an increase in tax revenues reduces the distortionary bias of future taxation and therefore leads to an increase in consumer confidence and consumption. Two supply side effects are proposed: a reduction in transfers reduced labour market pressures and government savings provided liquidity for financial markets, both of which increased incentives to invest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-235
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Economics and Economic Policy
Volume5
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Budget consolidations
  • Expansionary fiscal consolidations
  • Fiscal policy
  • Non-Keynesian effects
  • US economy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'US growth and budget consolidation in the 1990s: Was there a non-Keynesian effect?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this