Abstract
The 1990s were an extraordinary period for the US economy, both because of declining budget deficits and emerging budget surpluses, as well as high rates of economic growth. This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that high growth rates caused budget improvements, and claims that budget consolidations also contributed to fostering economic growth. We propose the existence of a non-Keynesian effect, where fiscal policy runs counter to Keynesian theory and fiscal consolidation can foster economic growth. We present empirical evidence that an increase in tax revenues reduces the distortionary bias of future taxation and therefore leads to an increase in consumer confidence and consumption. Two supply side effects are proposed: a reduction in transfers reduced labour market pressures and government savings provided liquidity for financial markets, both of which increased incentives to invest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 225-235 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Economics and Economic Policy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Budget consolidations
- Expansionary fiscal consolidations
- Fiscal policy
- Non-Keynesian effects
- US economy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'US growth and budget consolidation in the 1990s: Was there a non-Keynesian effect?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver