Abstract
An empirical evaluation of long-term period survival analysis was performed using data from the Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Italy. The aim was to update survival time trends and provide 25-year projections for children currently diagnosed with cancer. The observed survival experiences up to 15 years after diagnosis of five quinquennial cohorts (cohort analysis) were compared to the corresponding estimates obtained by period analysis. The two methods generally produced very similar findings, although period analysis estimates were slightly lower than those obtained from cohort analysis. We then used mixed analysis to assess time trends in long-term survival. This showed that the probability of surviving 25 years after a cancer in childhood has more than doubled compared to cohort analysis estimates from patients diagnosed more than 25 years ago (73% vs. 32%), providing further evidence of an ongoing improvement in prognosis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1135-1142 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | European Journal of Cancer |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Cancer registries
- Central nervous system neoplasms
- Childhood neoplasms
- Leukaemia
- Population-based studies
- Statistical methods
- Survival analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Updating long-term childhood cancer survival trend with period and mixed analysis: Good news from population-based estimates in Italy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver