Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Potential Effectiveness of an Online Gender-Based Violence Prevention Program for European Students—The Role of Gender Essentialism, Ambivalent Sexism, and Perceived Responsiveness of the University

  • Agnieszka E. Łyś
  • , Kamilla Bargiel-Matusiewicz
  • , Katrine Zeuthen
  • , Giussy Barbara
  • , Cristina Cattaneo
  • , Federica Collini
  • , Barbara Horten
  • , Petr Pavlík
  • , Irene Pellizzone
  • , Irena Smetáčková
  • , Esther Vitha Ringhof
  • , Abisha Visnu
  • , Marleen Orth

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study evaluates the potential effectiveness of an online course concerning gender-based violence prevention, which combines the bystander intervention approach and the myths-based approach. The sample consists of 67 students who participated in three measurements—before the course, immediately after the course, and 3 months later. Gender-based violence myth acceptance decreased, and bystander efficacy increased after the course. The effects were the strongest among people with high ambivalent sexism and gender essentialism. The results suggest that the course was effective; however, a replication on a bigger and more diverse sample is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3061-3090
Number of pages30
JournalViolence Against Women
Volume32
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • bystander efficacy
  • gender-based violence
  • gender-based violence myth acceptance
  • rape myth acceptance
  • violence prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Potential Effectiveness of an Online Gender-Based Violence Prevention Program for European Students—The Role of Gender Essentialism, Ambivalent Sexism, and Perceived Responsiveness of the University'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this