Abstract
This study investigates the quality of intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) within integrated reporting (IR). We performed a longitudinal analysis with the aim of addressing if a significant IC quality improvement occurred. We analysed 424 integrated reports, issued by 53 international companies operating in different industries over eight years (2013-2020). A manual content analysis was performed to assess the ICD quality. Findings reveal that the average level of ICD quality is low, for IC considered as a whole and for each of its three categories, while the IC category described most is that of relational capital. The quality of ICD increases over time. Investors and stakeholders need to know more about the quality of companies reports about intellectual capital to guide their
decision-making process. The study supports proprietary cost theory as it highlights a limited quality of ICD in IR even if with an improving trend over time
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 646-669 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- ICD
- integrated reporting
- intellectual capital
- intellectual capital disclosure
- proprietary cost theory
- quality
- relational capital
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The new challenge of Integrated Reporting: has it really improved corporate disclosure on Intellectual Capital'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver