Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of lifecourse socio-economic position and individual social mobility on breast cancer risk

  • Eloïse Berger
  • , Noële Maitre
  • , Francesca Romana Mancini
  • , Laura Baglietto
  • , Vittorio Perduca
  • , Hélène Colineaux
  • , Sabina Sieri
  • , Salvatore Panico
  • , Carlotta Sacerdote
  • , Rosario Tumino
  • , Paolo Vineis
  • , Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault
  • , Gianluca Severi
  • , Raphaële Castagné
  • , Cyrille Delpierre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Women with an advantaged socioeconomic position (SEP) have a higher risk of developing breast cancer (BC). The reasons for this association do not seem to be limited to reproductive factors and remain to be understood. We aimed to investigate the impact of lifecourse SEP from childhood and social mobility on the risk of BC considering a broad set of potential mediators. Methods: We used a discovery-replication strategy in two European prospective cohorts, E3N (N = 83,436) and EPIC-Italy (N = 20,530). In E3N, 7877 women were diagnosed with BC during a median 24.4 years of follow-up, while in EPIC-Italy, 893 BC cases were diagnosed within 15.1 years. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models on imputed data. Results: In E3N, women with higher education had a higher risk of BC (HR [95%CI] = 1.21 [1.12, 1.30]). This association was attenuated by adjusting for reproductive factors, in particular age at first childbirth (HR[95%CI] = 1.13 [1.04, 1.22]). Health behaviours, anthropometric variables, and BC screening had a weaker effect on the association. Women who remained in a stable advantaged SEP had a higher risk of BC (HR [95%CI] = 1.24 [1.07; 1.43]) attenuated after adjustment for potential mediators (HR [95%CI] = 1.13 [0.98; 1.31]). These results were replicated in EPIC-Italy. Conclusions: These results confirm the important role of reproductive factors in the social gradient in BC risk, which does not appear to be fully explained by the large set of potential mediators, including cancer screening, suggesting that further research is needed to identify additional mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1138
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Lifecourse socio-economic position
  • Prospective cohorts
  • Social mobility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of lifecourse socio-economic position and individual social mobility on breast cancer risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this