Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Hammersmith Score Optimises Patient Selection and Predicts for Overall Survival in Early-Phase Cancer Trial Participants Independent of Tumour Burden

  • James Alexander Korolewicz
  • , Bernhard Scheiner
  • , Claudia A.M. Fulgenzi
  • , Antonio D’Alessio
  • , Alessio Cortellini
  • , Chynna Pascual
  • , Aman Mehan
  • , Sarah Partridge
  • , Dorothy M. Gujral
  • , Waleed Mohammed
  • , Oreoluwa Mohammed
  • , Aneta Grzesiak
  • , Lauren Booker
  • , Susan Cleator
  • , Tzveta Pokrovska
  • , Waqar Saleem
  • , James Rackie
  • , Yasmine Needham
  • , Jonathan Krell
  • , Iain McNeish
  • Laura Tookman, Won Ho Edward Park, Muzamil Asif, Joanne S. Evans, David J. Pinato

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: As tumour response rates are increasingly demonstrated in early-phase cancer trials (EPCT), optimal patient selection and accurate prognostication are paramount. Hammersmith Score (HS), a simple prognostic index derived on routine biochemical measures (albumin <35 g/L, lactate dehydrogenase >450 IU/L, sodium <135 mmol/L), is a validated predictor of response and survival in EPCT participants. HS has not been validated in the cancer immunotherapy era. Methods: We retrospectively analysed characteristics and outcomes of unselected referrals to our early-phase unit (12/2019–12/2022). Independent predictors for overall survival (OS) were identified from univariable and multivariable models. HS was calculated for 66 eligible trial participants and compared with the Royal Marsden Score (RMS) to predict OS. Multivariable logistic regression and C-index was used to compare predictive ability of prognostic models. Results: Of 212 referrals, 147 patients were screened and 82 patients treated in EPCT. Prognostic stratification by HS identifies significant difference in median OS, and HS was confirmed as a multivariable predictor for OS (HR: HS 1 vs. 0 2.51, 95% CI: 1.01–6.24, p = 0.049; HS 2/3 vs. 0: 10.32, 95% CI: 2.15–49.62, p = 0.004; C-index 0.771) with superior multivariable predictive ability than RMS (HR: RMS 2 vs. 0/1 5.46, 95% CI: 1.12–26.57, p = 0.036; RMS 3 vs. 0/1 6.83, 95% CI: 1.15–40.53, p < 0.001; C-index 0.743). Conclusions: HS is a validated prognostic index for patients with advanced cancer treated in the context of modern EPCTs, independent of tumour burden. HS is a simple, inexpensive prognostic tool to optimise referral for EPCT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-211
Number of pages7
JournalChemotherapy
Volume69
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Early-phase trial prognostic score

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Hammersmith Score Optimises Patient Selection and Predicts for Overall Survival in Early-Phase Cancer Trial Participants Independent of Tumour Burden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this