Abstract
This article investigates how the distribution of income changes when the standard disposable income (DI) is replaced by an extended income (EI) concept that includes the three “I”s: indirect taxes, imputed rent, and in-kind benefits. Second, it assesses the distributional effects of the main types of tax-benefit instruments under different income concepts. The analysis covers three European countries (Belgium, Greece, and the United Kingdom) characterized by substantially different tax-benefit systems. The overall redistributive effect of the tax-benefit systems depends heavily on the income concept considered and the differences across countries are smaller when considering the EI. Moreover, the common use of a narrower income concept, such as the DI, can lead to the overestimation of the redistributive effect of the cash tax-benefit instruments (in relative terms), the extent of this varying across countries, due to the size and distribution of three “I”s and the adoption of the needs-adjusted equivalence scale.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 347-372 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Public Finance Review |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 May 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- EUROMOD
- household income
- imputed rent
- in-kind benefits
- indirect taxes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Distributional Effects of Taxes and Transfers Under Alternative Income Concepts: The Importance of Three “I”s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver