Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The care process self-evaluation tool: A valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams

  • Deborah Seys
  • , Svin Deneckere
  • , Walter Sermeus
  • , Eva Van Gerven
  • , Massimiliano Panella
  • , Luk Bruyneel
  • , Timothy Mutsvari
  • , Rafaela Camacho Bejarano
  • , Seval Kul
  • , Kris Vanhaecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table. Methods. The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated. Results: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach's alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated. Conclusions: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams.

Original languageEnglish
Article number325
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • CPSET
  • Care process
  • Health care teams
  • Multicenter study
  • Multidisciplinary teams
  • Organization of care
  • Psychometric properties
  • Reliability
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The care process self-evaluation tool: A valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this