Textual Criticism(s) and the Edition of Spanish Classics. An Example from the Debate over Góngora’s Soledades: the Application of the Genealogical-Reconstructive Method to the Abbot of Rute’s "Examen del Antídoto"

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This essay has two main goals: first, to give an idea of both the increasing interest in textual criticism that, over the last thirty years, has shaken Hispanic philology, and the plurality of methods that scholars have been trying out in order to edit Spanish classics; second, to offer an example of the genealogical-reconstructive method’s application by summarizing the most relevant outcomes of my previous research on the tradition of one of the most significant texts of the debate over Góngora’s Soledades, i.e. Francisco Fernández de Córdoba’s "Examen del Antídoto". Such case study, in fact, displays three of the main issues faced by philologists: the existence of an archetype, contamination, and potentially authorial variants.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationÉdition de textes canoniques nationaux. Le cas de la Commedia de Dante
PublisherEAC - Éditions des Archives Contemporaines
Pages161-176
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)978-28-130-0291-4
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Textual Criticism
  • Lachmann’s method
  • Francisco Fernández de Córdoba
  • Examen del Antídoto
  • gongorine controversy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Textual Criticism(s) and the Edition of Spanish Classics. An Example from the Debate over Góngora’s Soledades: the Application of the Genealogical-Reconstructive Method to the Abbot of Rute’s "Examen del Antídoto"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this