TY - JOUR
T1 - Textbook Outcomes and Minimally Invasive Techniques in Resectable Gallbladder Cancer
T2 - A Global Cohort Study
AU - Cremona, Simone
AU - Ielpo, Benedetto
AU - Di Martino, Marcello
AU - Podda, Mauro
AU - Di Franco, Gregorio
AU - Furbetta, Niccoló
AU - Comandatore, Annalisa
AU - Giuliante, Felice
AU - Aldrighetti, Luca
AU - Martinie, John
AU - Izzo, Francesco
AU - Sucandy, Iswanto
AU - di Benedetto, Fabrizio
AU - Troisi, Roberto
AU - Donadon, Matteo
AU - Ruzzenente, Andrea
AU - Torzilli, Guido
AU - Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
AU - Morelli, Luca
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Introduction: Surgery for resectable gallbladder cancer (GbC) encompasses complex operative management, and evaluating surgical quality through textbook outcome (TO) is crucial. This study aimed to assess TO incidence and impact in a global cohort, identify independent predictors, and evaluate TO rates of minimally invasive (MI) techniques, including robotic (ROB) and laparoscopic (LPS). Materials and methods: This cohort study included patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy and lymphadenectomy for GbC (T1b–T3) from 2012 to 2023 in 41 hospitals. TO was defined as the absence of intraoperative transfusion, major complications, readmission, reoperation, or 90-day mortality, alongside negative margins and ≥6 retrieved lymph nodes. MI-TO additionally required no conversion. A 1:1 propensity score matching compared TO in open (OPEN) and MI approaches. Data were analyzed from July to November 2024. Results: Among 667 patients (MI, 361; OPEN, 306), TO was achieved in 205 (30.7 %), with no difference between OPEN and MI. ROB independently increased TO (odds ratio, 4.297; p = 0.002), achieving higher MI-TO (37.8 % vs. 23.2 %; p = 0.003), better lymphadenectomy (≥6 nodes: 55.3 % vs. 40.6 %; p = 0.009), and fewer OPEN conversions (1.2 % vs. 13.7 %; p < 0.001) than LPS. TO correlated with lower mortality (HR, 0.506; p = 0.001) and recurrence (HR, 0.682; p = 0.027). Conclusion: TO in resectable GbC is achieved in one-third of cases, with significant long-term benefits. MI is effective, with ROB outperforming LPS in MI-TO measures. These results establish a benchmark for centers to enhance outcomes.
AB - Introduction: Surgery for resectable gallbladder cancer (GbC) encompasses complex operative management, and evaluating surgical quality through textbook outcome (TO) is crucial. This study aimed to assess TO incidence and impact in a global cohort, identify independent predictors, and evaluate TO rates of minimally invasive (MI) techniques, including robotic (ROB) and laparoscopic (LPS). Materials and methods: This cohort study included patients undergoing curative-intent hepatectomy and lymphadenectomy for GbC (T1b–T3) from 2012 to 2023 in 41 hospitals. TO was defined as the absence of intraoperative transfusion, major complications, readmission, reoperation, or 90-day mortality, alongside negative margins and ≥6 retrieved lymph nodes. MI-TO additionally required no conversion. A 1:1 propensity score matching compared TO in open (OPEN) and MI approaches. Data were analyzed from July to November 2024. Results: Among 667 patients (MI, 361; OPEN, 306), TO was achieved in 205 (30.7 %), with no difference between OPEN and MI. ROB independently increased TO (odds ratio, 4.297; p = 0.002), achieving higher MI-TO (37.8 % vs. 23.2 %; p = 0.003), better lymphadenectomy (≥6 nodes: 55.3 % vs. 40.6 %; p = 0.009), and fewer OPEN conversions (1.2 % vs. 13.7 %; p < 0.001) than LPS. TO correlated with lower mortality (HR, 0.506; p = 0.001) and recurrence (HR, 0.682; p = 0.027). Conclusion: TO in resectable GbC is achieved in one-third of cases, with significant long-term benefits. MI is effective, with ROB outperforming LPS in MI-TO measures. These results establish a benchmark for centers to enhance outcomes.
KW - Gallbladder cancer
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Lymphadenectomy
KW - Open surgery
KW - Radical cholecystectomy
KW - Robotic
KW - Textbook outcomes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015053301
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110284
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110284
M3 - Article
SN - 0748-7983
VL - 51
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 10
M1 - 110284
ER -