Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

TEAM Study: Upfront Docetaxel Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Real-World, Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis

  • Chiara Pisano
  • , Fabio Turco
  • , Elena Arnaudo
  • , Elena Fea
  • , Paola Vanella
  • , Fiorella Ruatta
  • , Roberto Filippi
  • , Federica Brusa
  • , Veronica Prati
  • , Federica Vana
  • , Alessia Mennitto
  • , Carlo Cattrini
  • , Francesca Vignani
  • , Rossana Dionisio
  • , Massimiliano Icardi
  • , Pamela Guglielmini
  • , Roberta Buosi
  • , Ilaria Stevani
  • , Roberto Vormola
  • , Gianmauro Numico
  • Ilaria Depetris, Alessandro Comandone, Alessandra Gennari, Mario Airoldi, Maura Rossi, Giorgio Vellani, Cinzia Ortega, Marcello Tucci, Massimo Di Maio, Consuelo Buttigliero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) dramatically changed. PEACE-1 and ARASENS trials established triplet therapy efficacy. Identifying prognostic factors supporting treatment choice is pivotal. Methods: TEAM is an observational, retrospective study to evaluate prognostic role of variables in mHSPC patients receiving upfront docetaxel in 11 Italian centers. Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS). Results: From September 2014 to December 2020, 147 patients were included. Median PFS and OS were 11.6 and 37.4 months. At univariate analysis, PFS-related variables were Gleason Score (GS) (P = .001), opioid use (P = .004), bone metastases number (P < .001), baseline PSA (P = .006), Hb (P < .001), ALP (P < .001) and LDH (P = .002), time between ADT and docetaxel start (P = .018), 3-month PSA (P < .001) and ALP (P < .001), and number of docetaxel cycles (P < .001). OS-related variables were PSA at diagnosis (P = .024), primary tumor treatment (P = .022), baseline pain (P = .015), opioid use (P < .001), bone metastases number (P < . 001), baseline Hb (P < .001), ALP (P < .001) and LDH (P = .001), NLR ratio (P = .039), 3-month PSA (P < .001) and ALP (P < .001) and docetaxel cycles number (P < .001). At multivariate analysis, independent prognostic variables were GS, opioid use, baseline LDH and time between ADT and docetaxel initiation for PFS, and baseline Hb and LDH for OS. Conclusion: Patients receiving upfront docetaxel with high GS, high disease burden, pain or opioid use, baseline unfavorable laboratory values had worse outcomes. Patients had greater docetaxel benefit when initiated early after ADT start. These parameters could be taken into account when selecting candidates for triplet therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-67.e16
JournalClinical Genitourinary Cancer
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Docetaxel
  • Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
  • Prognostic factors
  • Triplet therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TEAM Study: Upfront Docetaxel Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Real-World, Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this