Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Silica and renal diseases: No longer a problem in the 21st century?

  • P. Stratta
  • , C. Canavese
  • , A. Messuerotti
  • , I. Fenoglio
  • , B. Fubini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Silicosis and other occupational diseases are still important even in the most developed countries. In fact, at present, silica exposure may be a risk factor for human health not only for workers but also for consumers. Furthermore, this exposure is associated with many other different disorders besides pulmonary silicosis, such as progressive systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatomyositis, glomerulonephritis and vasculitis. The relationships between these silica-related diseases need to be clarified, but pathogenic responses to silica are likely to be mediated by interaction of silica particles with the immune system, mainly by activation of macrophages. As regards renal pathology, there is no single specific clinical or laboratory finding of silica-induced nephropathy: renal involvement may occur as a toxic effect or in a context of autoimmune disease, and silica damage may act as an additive factor on an existing, well-established renal disease. An occupational history must be obtained for all renal patients, checking particularly for exposure to silica, heavy metals, and solvents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-247
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Nephrology
Volume14
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • End stage renal disease
  • Nephropathy
  • Occupational dust diseases
  • Occupational exposure
  • Silica

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Silica and renal diseases: No longer a problem in the 21st century?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this