Abstract
The Italian legislation provides a two-term limits for mayors, but it allows term-limited mayors to pass on the torch to one of their deputies as candidates for mayorship. We exploit this feature of the electoral system to design a novel identification strategy for separating the effects of 'accountability' (the difference in performance between two politicians facing different incentives in terms of re-elections) and 'competence' (the difference in performance between two politicians with different experience in policy making). Using a panel of 1203 Italian municipalities, from 1998 to 2015, we find a significant role for competence but not for accountability in affecting municipal spending. Specifically, second-and-last-term mayors, and first-term mayors with previous experience as executive officers, spend less, on average, than inexperienced first-term mayors. We also discuss the policy implications of this finding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 597-647 |
| Number of pages | 51 |
| Journal | Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2024 |
Keywords
- Italian municipalities
- accountability
- competence
- term limits
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Separating the Accountability and Competence Effects of Mayors on Municipal Spending'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver