Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Scientific Misinformation and Fake News: A Blurred Boundary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

If political fake news is a serious concern for democratic politics, no less worrisome is scientific news with patently distorted content. Prima facie, scientific misinformation partially escapes the definition of fake news provided by empirical and philosophical analysis, mainly patterned after political disinformation. Most notably, we aim to show that people are often unaware not only of disseminating, but also of producing false or misleading information. However, by leveraging the philosophical and psychological literature, we advance some reasons for keeping scientific misinformation under the same umbrella, broadening the definition of fake news in order to account for it as well. In concluding, we shall advance some ideas on how to reform scientific communication, which may help to address the issue of scientific misinformation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-718
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Epistemology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • Fake news
  • motivated reasoning
  • scientific misinformation
  • self-deception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scientific Misinformation and Fake News: A Blurred Boundary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this