Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia

  • Aristoteles Giagounidis
  • , Ghulam J. Mufti
  • , Pierre Fenaux
  • , Mikkael A. Sekeres
  • , Jeffrey Szer
  • , Uwe Platzbecker
  • , Andrea Kuendgen
  • , Gianluca Gaidano
  • , Wieslaw Wiktor-Jedrzejczak
  • , Kuolung Hu
  • , Paul Woodard
  • , Allen S. Yang
  • , Hagop M. Kantarjian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND Thrombocytopenia in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is associated with shortened survival and an increased risk of evolution to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of romiplostim in patients who had thrombocytopenia with low-risk/intermediate- 1-risk MDS. METHODS Patients who had thrombocytopenia with low-risk/ intermediate-1-risk MDS (N = 250) were randomized 2:1 to receive romiplostim or placebo weekly for 58 weeks. RESULTS The primary endpoint - the number of clinically significant bleeding events (CSBEs) per patient - had a hazard ratio for romiplostim:placebo of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.05; P = .13). CSBEs were reduced significantly in the romiplostim group for patients who had baseline platelet counts ≥20 × 109/L (P < .0001). For patients who had baseline platelet counts <20 × 109/L, there was no difference in the number of CSBEs, but the platelet transfusion rates were higher in the placebo group (P < .0001), which may have affected the overall CSBE results in this group with severe thrombocytopenia. The incidence of bleeding events was reduced significantly in the romiplostim group (relative risk, 0.92), as were protocol-defined platelet transfusions (relative risk, 0.77). Platelet response rates according to 2006 International Working Group criteria were higher for the group that received romiplostim (odds ratio, 15.6). On the basis of interim data, an independent data monitoring committee advised halting study drug because of concerns regarding excess blasts and AML rates with romiplostim (interim hazard ratio, 2.51). At 58 weeks, the AML rates were 6% in the romiplostim group and 4.9% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-3.84), and the overall survival rates were similar. CONCLUSIONS Romiplostim treatment in patients with low-risk/ intermediate-1-risk MDS increased platelet counts and decreased the number of bleeding events and platelet transfusions. Although study drug was discontinued because of an initial concern of AML risk, survival and AML rates were similar with romiplostim and placebo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1838-1846
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume120
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • drug therapy
  • myelodysplastic syndromes
  • randomized controlled trial
  • romiplostim
  • thrombocytopenia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Results of a randomized, double-blind study of romiplostim versus placebo in patients with low/intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this