Real-world adoption of left bundle branch area pacing: Insights from the Conduction-System pacing Italian Network Group (C-SING)

Gabriele Dell'Era, Pietro Palmisano, Matteo Bertini, Massimo Magnano, Matteo Baroni, Mario Volpicelli, Gianluca Mirizzi, Paolo Donateo, Luca De Mattia, Alessandro Paoletti Perini, Giovanni Rovaris, Francesco Solimene, Antonio Rapacciuolo, Francesco Raffaele Spera, Luca Poggio, Bruna Catuzzo, Enrico Boggio, Leonardo Marinaccio, Carlo Bonanno, Giacomo MugnaiDonatella Ruggiero, Riccardo Sacchi, Alessandra Tordini, Gianni Pastore, Aldo Coppolino, Massimo Vito Tritto, Giuseppe Campisi, Gennaro Miracapillo, Paola Napoli, Daniele Giacopelli, Giuseppe Patti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and objective: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is increasingly used for treating bradycardia and heart failure. However, real-world data are limited. The Conduction-System Pacing Italian Network Group (C-SING) collected prospective data on LBBAP procedures in a nationwide context. Methods: Observational data from 28 Italian sites were analysed for consecutive LBBAP procedures, comparing outcomes based on operator experience levels. Results: From January 2022 to December 2023, 1250 patients (median age 78, 66.2 % male) underwent LBBAP attempt. Most frequent indications were atrioventricular block (40.8 %) and heart failure (25.6 %). Successful lead implantation was achieved in 1207 procedures (96.6 %), with a median fluoroscopy time of 6.2 min. Significant QRS duration reduction was observed in patients with interventricular conduction delay (144 ms to 120 ms, p < 0.001). Compared to low-experience operators (0–10 previous cases), high-experience operators (>50 cases) had significantly better outcomes, with reduced fluoroscopy time (5.9 min versus 9.0 min, p = 0.005) and an 86 % lower risk of lead implantation failure (adjusted odds ratio 0.14, p = 0.002). Periprocedural complications occurred in 6.2 % of patients, unaffected by operator experience. Follow-up data for 794 patients over a median of 93 days showed stable LBBAP pacing parameters and a 1.3 % loss of LBBAP capture. Conclusions: LBBAP is routinely adopted for bradycardia and heart failure indication, with high success and acceptable complication rates, even when performed by less experienced operators. However, procedure outcomes improved significantly as operators gained experience with at least 50 prior cases. Electrical parameters remained stable with a low rate of LBBAP loss during short-term follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Article number132879
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume421
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Conduction system pacing
  • Learning curve
  • Left bundle branch area pacing
  • Procedural success
  • Real-world, complications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world adoption of left bundle branch area pacing: Insights from the Conduction-System pacing Italian Network Group (C-SING)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this