Abstract
[Machine translation] On the cognitive and ontological efficacy of falsehood in history according to Umberto Eco. Falsehood derives its strength from the “continuity of tradition”, from a contagious word of mouth that involves texts of a disparate nature, both oral and written, from gossip to fake news, to conspiracy theories, which are spread from mouth to mouth — from link to link — distorting and inflating pieces of reality through the mechanism of hermetic semiosis. , In the vigilant awareness of the aggressive and violent power of these inventions, Eco shows another side of the force of falsehood. In his opinion, there is a need for simulation, its irreplaceable pedagogical function. In addition to coinciding with error and lies, it occupies the territory of verifiable rhetoric and narrative fiction, which the Alexandrian intellectual explored with inexhaustible commitment as an analyst and creator.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Machine translation] How strong is the fake according to Umberto Eco |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages | 63-74 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
| Event | Le molte vite di Umberto Eco - San Salvatore Monferrato Duration: 1 Jan 2024 → … |
Conference
| Conference | Le molte vite di Umberto Eco |
|---|---|
| City | San Salvatore Monferrato |
| Period | 1/01/24 → … |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Umberto Eco, verità/falso, realtà/menzogna
- Il Pendolo di Foucault, Baudolino
- semiosi ermetica
- complotto
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] How strong is the fake according to Umberto Eco'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver