Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quanto forte è il falso secondo Umberto Eco

Translated title of the contribution: [Machine translation] How strong is the fake according to Umberto Eco

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

[Machine translation] On the cognitive and ontological efficacy of falsehood in history according to Umberto Eco. Falsehood derives its strength from the “continuity of tradition”, from a contagious word of mouth that involves texts of a disparate nature, both oral and written, from gossip to fake news, to conspiracy theories, which are spread from mouth to mouth — from link to link — distorting and inflating pieces of reality through the mechanism of hermetic semiosis. , In the vigilant awareness of the aggressive and violent power of these inventions, Eco shows another side of the force of falsehood. In his opinion, there is a need for simulation, its irreplaceable pedagogical function. In addition to coinciding with error and lies, it occupies the territory of verifiable rhetoric and narrative fiction, which the Alexandrian intellectual explored with inexhaustible commitment as an analyst and creator.
Translated title of the contribution[Machine translation] How strong is the fake according to Umberto Eco
Original languageItalian
Pages63-74
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2024
EventLe molte vite di Umberto Eco - San Salvatore Monferrato
Duration: 1 Jan 2024 → …

Conference

ConferenceLe molte vite di Umberto Eco
CitySan Salvatore Monferrato
Period1/01/24 → …

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Umberto Eco, verità/falso, realtà/menzogna
  • Il Pendolo di Foucault, Baudolino
  • semiosi ermetica
  • complotto

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] How strong is the fake according to Umberto Eco'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this